MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
53,552 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings under sill to floor pan holed (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings under sill to rear wheel arch holed (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings inner wheel arch holed (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings outer sill holed (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings inner wheel arch holed (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings outer sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
all 4 shockers weak
rear wiper blade worn out
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. front brake discs worped (3.7.B.5b)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both rear wishbone bushes (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules both (3.6.B.4e)
Front both sides bottom arm bushes have had black glue covering them
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner cill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Trailing arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both (2.4.G.2)
Rear Trailing arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both axle bushes (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded cill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner arch (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded inner cill (2.4.A.3)
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules both (3.6.B.4e)
Front both sides bottom arm bushes have had black glue covering them
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner cill (2.4.A.3)
Rear Trailing arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both (2.4.G.2)
Rear Trailing arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both axle bushes (2.4.G.2)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded both inner wings (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded Outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrules both (3.6.B.4e)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both (2.4.G.2)
Front of o/s outer sill going rusty
The rest of n/s outer sill going rusty
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear tyre is perishing
Nearside Rear wheel bearing rough when rotated (2.6.1)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear tyre is perishing
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front inner wheel arches and rear of o/s outer sill going rusty
N/s rear tyre perishing
Very slight roughness from n/s rear wheel bearing
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front inner wheel arches and rear of o/s outer sill going rusty
N/s rear tyre perishing
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Very slight roughness from n/s rear wheel bearing
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front inner wheel arches and o/s rear outer sill going rusty
N/s rear tyre cracking
Very slight roughness from n/s rear wheel bearing
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Front inner wings going rusty
Rear of o/s outer sill going rusty
Wear in o/s of steering rack
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Wear in o/s steering rack.
o/s/f inner wing is going rusty.
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Slight wear in steering rack
Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.2.B.1f)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CN53 YTY is a 2003 Ford Ka in Silver with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CN53 YTY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CN53 YTY?
You can check the full history of CN53 YTY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CN53 YTY registered?
CN53 YTY is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 11 September 2003.
Is CN53 YTY safe to buy?
The MOT history for CN53 YTY shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CN53 YTY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CN53 YTY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.