MOT Status
ValidMileage
142,358 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
corrosion in places
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective x2 (4.1.1 (b) (i))
corrosion in places
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Both (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Both (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Bumper mountings corroded but not likely to become detached (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced many places (6.1.1 (c) (i))
towbar removed
under side covered in mud
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn x2 (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Rear Towbar component excessively corroded (6.1.6 (a))
Rear Vehicle structure is fractured and structural rigidity is significantly reduced and corroded (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced many places (6.1.1 (c) (i))
under side covered in mud
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
Brake load sensing valve linkage defective and function impaired (1.1.17 (a))
Headlamp lens seriously defective both (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring shackle pin or bush excessively worn both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Service brake efficiency below requirements (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Parking (secondary brake) on a single line braking system has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.3.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Service brake has no recorded effort at a wheel (1.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
underside of vehicle in poor condition and covered in mud
Fuel system component leaking (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp light intensity severely reduced n/s and o/s (4.1.4 (a))
Nearside Front Inner Track rod end ball joint has excessive play as chalked (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Steering box has excessive free play detected at the steering wheel (steering box fitted) (2.3 (a) (i))
Steering box leaking to the extent that oil is dripping (2.1.1 (e) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
underside of vehicle in poor condition and covered in mud
Front number plate cracked but not likely to be misread
underside of vehicle covered in mud/dirt
Central Prop shaft joint excessively worn universal (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Front Position lamp not working both (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp light intensity severely reduced both (4.1.4 (a))
Nearside Front Drag link end ball joint has excessive play as chalked (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Drag link end ball joint has excessive play as chalked (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Inner Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength chassis as chalked (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Service brake excessively fluctuating n/s and o/s (1.2.1 (e))
Steering box leaking to the extent that oil is dripping (2.1.1 (e) (ii))
Front number plate cracked but not likely to be misread
Offside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
underside of vehicle covered in mud/dirt
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
advise underbody very dirty
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Leaf spring shackle pin or bush excessively worn both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Intermediate drop arm pivot housing casing has relative movement to chassis/bodywork both idlers (2.1.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all (1.1.11 (c))
advise underbody very dirty
N/S & O/S rear chassis - heavy surface corrosion
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Offside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP09 OHF is a 2009 Ford Ranger in White with a 2,500cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.4% with a typical mileage of 86,225 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP09 OHF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ranger is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP09 OHF?
You can check the full history of CP09 OHF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP09 OHF registered?
CP09 OHF is a 2009 Ford Ranger, first registered on 10 July 2009.
Is CP09 OHF safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP09 OHF shows 21 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP09 OHF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP09 OHF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.