MOT Status
ValidMileage
102,584 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Also has nail in tread (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Also has nail in tread (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Central Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view STONECHIP - NOT AFFECTING VIEW (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. N/S/FRONT BRAKE NOTED LESS EFFORT (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated GAITER SPLIT - ONLY JUST PASSED (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH FRONT TYRES VERY BADLY WORN ON INNER EDGES (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Nail in tyre ()
Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH FRONT TYRES VERY BADLY WORN ON INNER EDGES (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Nail in tyre ()
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view STONECHIP IN SWEPT AREA (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH REAR TYRES WEARING ON INNER EDGES (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Lower Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view STONECHIP IN SWEPT AREA (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge BOTH REAR TYRES WEARING ON INNER EDGES (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Passenger's seat backrest cannot be secured in the upright position. OFFSIDE & CENTRAL REAR SEATS NOT LOCKING INTO SECURE POSITION (6.2.6 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
both front tyres wearing on the outer edge
SLIGHT DAMAGE TO N/S/F TYRE OUTER SIDE WALL
Nearside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
SLIGHT DAMAGE TO N/S/F TYRE OUTER SIDE WALL
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Steering rack gaiter insecure (2.2.D.2d)
How Reliable is the Ford C-max?
Based on 1,804,249 MOT tests across 138,182 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP10 ZTZ is a 2010 Ford C-max in Silver with a 1,753cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2010 Ford C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.4% with a typical mileage of 64,418 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 25,824 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP10 ZTZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Ford C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP10 ZTZ?
You can check the full history of CP10 ZTZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP10 ZTZ registered?
CP10 ZTZ is a 2010 Ford C-max, first registered on 23 August 2010.
Is CP10 ZTZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP10 ZTZ shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP10 ZTZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP10 ZTZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.