MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
118,419 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all 4 and mount areas (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive torsion bar mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front body corroded
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge outer (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive spring mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
tipper body frame and mounts corroded
Nearside Front Body component corroded and likely to cause injury seat belt area (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Body component corroded and likely to cause injury tipper body (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all 4 and mount areas (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive torsion bar mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front body corroded
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge outer (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive spring mounts (5.3.6 (a) (i))
tipper body frame and mounts corroded
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all 4 (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced complete chassis and rear tipping body frame on chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Body panel corroded and likely to cause injury tipping body (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Position lamp lens seriously defective not the same lamp as other side (4.2.1 (b))
Rear Body panel corroded and likely to cause injury tipping body floor (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all 4 (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced complete chassis and rear tipping body frame on chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Front Anti-roll bar pin or bush excessively worn O/S & N/S - Attachment to lower arms (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Headlamp aim too high (4.1.2 (a))
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Outer Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear reflector missing (1.5.1a)
Offside Rear brake drum contaminated by oil (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear reflector missing (1.5.1a)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nail in nearside rear tyre
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
n/s/r inner tyre flat
Nearside Headlamp aim too high when the centre of the headlamp is below 850mm from the ground (1.6.B2)
Nearside Outer Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Offside Headlamp aim too high when the centre of the headlamp is below 850mm from the ground (1.6.B2)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear fog lamp missing (1.3.2a)
Nearside Inner Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Inner Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Outer Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Toyota Dyna?
Based on 55,890 MOT tests across 3,653 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP52 OCF is a 2002 Toyota Dyna in White with a 2,494cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.2%.
Across all 2002 Toyota Dyna models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.8% with a typical mileage of 88,600 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Toyota Dyna fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 1,652 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP52 OCF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Toyota Dyna typically stays on UK roads for around 25 years. At 24 years old, this Toyota Dyna is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP52 OCF?
You can check the full history of CP52 OCF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP52 OCF registered?
CP52 OCF is a 2002 Toyota Dyna, first registered on 15 November 2002.
Is CP52 OCF safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP52 OCF shows 22 tests with a 68.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP52 OCF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP52 OCF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.