MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
112,152 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Central Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Horizontal round bar. With holes. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Hole. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Chassis has a hole connected to the horizontal round bar. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Rear suspension mounting has a hole/Chassis. (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Rear Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Front General underbody corrosion.
Nearside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Wheel arc has a hole due to corrosion. (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Direction indicator lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Lens has a hole. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Wearing on the edge. (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear General rear underbody severely corroded.
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Seat belts not tested due to things on top of the seat.
Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Fuel cap/sealing device missing (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength CHASSIS LEG X2 PLACES (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage insecurely attached (5.3.3 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Leaf spring fractured (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
Front RADIATOR SUPPORT,O/S/F & O/S/R BODY MOUNTS,O/S/F OUTER SILL
Offside Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both rear chassis legs have corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear fog lamp missing (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded to the extent that control of the vehicle is likely to be adversely affected spring hanger (5.3.6 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Vehicle structure has slight corrosion x member (6.1.B.2)
Front Lower x member heavy corrosion and holed
front valance/xmember corroded and holed
Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
front valance/xmember corroded and holed
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP53 AFK is a 2003 Ford Ranger in Blue with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.2%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.7% with a typical mileage of 94,107 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP53 AFK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ranger is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP53 AFK?
You can check the full history of CP53 AFK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP53 AFK registered?
CP53 AFK is a 2003 Ford Ranger, first registered on 23 October 2003.
Is CP53 AFK safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP53 AFK shows 22 tests with a 68.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP53 AFK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP53 AFK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.