MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
129,477 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Inner Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced inner wheel arch area behind headlamp (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Inner Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Centre inner sill area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Inner Integral body structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced centre inner sill area (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All flexible brake hose ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material All metal brake lines corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Exhaust system corroding
Front Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing Both front corroding (5.3.2 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Outer sill covers fitted
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis corroding in most areas (6.1.1 (c) (i))
General underside corrosion
Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule All flexible brake hose ferrules (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Exhausts system corroding
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides front (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both front wearing on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both sides front (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both sides inner sills corroding (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Close to legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Wearing on edges (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Sill covers fitted
Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both front (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
both front antiroll bar mountings deteriorating
sills covers covers
underside corroding in general
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Wheel bearing has excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Front Vehicle structure strengthening plate or fastening so insecure that structural rigidity is seriously reduced crossmember (6.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened both front (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
both front antiroll bar mountings deteriorating
sills covers covers
underside corroding in general
Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front anti rool bar d bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both front (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Outer sill covers fitted
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure is deformed but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both inner sills corroding (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Exhaust silencer insecure (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Hydraulic brake cylinder leaking and braking performance affected (1.1.16 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front anti rool bar d bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Both front (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Outer sill covers fitted
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Chassis (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure is deformed but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both inner sills corroding (6.1.1 (a) (i))
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Fluid leak, but not excessive Slight coolant leak from radiator (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive Slight engine oil leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Rear brake imbalance 22% (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Battery insecure and likely to cause a short circuit (4.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting n/s/f inner wheel arch/inner wing area (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both front (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Fluid leak, but not excessive Slight coolant leak from radiator (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive Slight engine oil leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Rear brake imbalance 22% (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened crossmember (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Exhaust system insecure (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases centerbox rotten (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers damaged to the extent that it does not function (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Upper Exhaust silencer insecure silencer box missing (8.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers damaged to the extent that it does not function (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
brake warning light on
underside of vehicle slightly corroded
both rear tyres worn close to limit
How Reliable is the Suzuki Vitara?
Based on 810,456 MOT tests across 108,223 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP55 WWD is a 2005 Suzuki Vitara in Silver with a 1,998cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.2%.
Across all 2005 Suzuki Vitara models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.6% with a typical mileage of 65,318 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Suzuki Vitara fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 34,457 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP55 WWD, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Suzuki Vitara typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 21 years old, this Suzuki Vitara is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP55 WWD?
You can check the full history of CP55 WWD by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP55 WWD registered?
CP55 WWD is a 2005 Suzuki Vitara, first registered on 23 September 2005.
Is CP55 WWD safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP55 WWD shows 23 tests with a 65.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP55 WWD have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP55 WWD. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.