MOT Status
ValidMileage
69,128 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake cable damaged but not to excess ns and os cable casing split (1.1.15 (a))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases exhaust clamp missing, flexi joint broken but nop major leak of exhaust fumes (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Brake cable damaged but not to excess ns and os outer casings split with rust bleed from inner core (1.1.15 (a))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases flexi joint (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively with signs of heat at disc (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated pin hole (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge 2.8 mm (5.2.3 (e))
nsr mud guard touching tyre when jacked up
Offside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush ns and os upper (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Shock absorbers has negligible damping effect ns and os (5.3.2 (d))
Brake cable damaged but not to excess ns and os outer casings split with rust bleed from inner core (1.1.15 (a))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Front Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases flexi joint (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively with signs of heat at disc (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated pin hole (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge 2.8 mm (5.2.3 (e))
nsr mud guard touching tyre when jacked up
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Corrosion on rear axle.
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Corrosion on rear axle.
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened n s and os (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2.3mm (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush ns and os rear (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened n s and os (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2.3mm (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush ns and os rear (5.3.2 (c))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened top of shock shaft (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Macpherson strut corroded but not seriously weakened top of shock shaft (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Rear Coil spring corroded both rear springs (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly chafed (1.1.12 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Suspension arm has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear exhaust corroded
Offside Front Lower Front suspension ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Rear exhaust corroded
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear exhaust corroded
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
rear ex box corroded
How Reliable is the Fiat Panda?
Based on 1,821,354 MOT tests across 128,867 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP59 RKA is a 2010 Fiat Panda in Red with a 1,108cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2010 Fiat Panda models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.7% with a typical mileage of 45,770 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Fiat Panda fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 66,636 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP59 RKA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Fiat Panda typically stays on UK roads for around 22 years. At 16 years old, this Fiat Panda is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP59 RKA?
You can check the full history of CP59 RKA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP59 RKA registered?
CP59 RKA is a 2010 Fiat Panda, first registered on 16 January 2010.
Is CP59 RKA safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP59 RKA shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP59 RKA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP59 RKA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.