MOT Status
ValidMileage
108,823 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
non components related advisory = steam coming from coolant radiator area , coolant level ok and no visual sign of a leak (may be due to the wet weather , advice to keep an eye on coolant level)
Nearside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
non components related advisory = steam coming from coolant radiator area , coolant level ok and no visual sign of a leak (may be due to the wet weather , advice to keep an eye on coolant level)
Offside Front Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive body sill area (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive body sill area (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Rear nearside and offside rear brake verry noisy attention required
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front service brake slightly lagging in operation
Nearside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Attention Required heavy metallic noise when service brake in operation
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front service brake slightly lagging in operation
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule x 2 (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened axle area (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened axle area (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule x 2 (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened axle area (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Coil spring mounting corroded but not seriously weakened axle area (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Central Exhaust system insecure (6.1.2 (a))
Front Radiator support bracket heavily corroded
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Spring pan (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Spring pan (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Beam axle corroded
Nearside Rear Service brake excessively binding (1.2.1 (f))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Radiator support bracket heavily corroded
Nearside Front Seat belt webbing slightly damaged or frayed (7.1.2 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Spring pan (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Spring pan (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Beam axle corroded
front coolant radiator sub-frame heavily corroded
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 2.1mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit 2.2mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 2.0mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit 2.8mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Renault Clio?
Based on 14,729,048 MOT tests across 1,134,954 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP61 EAF is a 2011 Renault Clio in Blue with a 1,149cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2011 Renault Clio models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.1% with a typical mileage of 54,777 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Renault Clio fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 660,730 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP61 EAF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Renault Clio typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 15 years old, this Renault Clio is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP61 EAF?
You can check the full history of CP61 EAF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP61 EAF registered?
CP61 EAF is a 2011 Renault Clio, first registered on 24 November 2011.
Is CP61 EAF safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP61 EAF shows 18 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP61 EAF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP61 EAF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.