MOT Status
ValidMileage
118,291 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Rear suspension lower bushes deteriorating
Rear trailing arm bushes deteriorating
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
General corrosion to rear suspension components and mounting points
Nearside rear tyre wearing on outer edge
Rear suspension lower bushes deteriorating
Rear trailing arm bushes deteriorating
Slight play in offside steering arm inner ball joint
Central Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Small chip in windscreen to nearside. (3.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Lens damaged. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Ferrules to both rear brake hoses corroding. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Rear suspension arms and components are corroding. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Small chip in windscreen to nearside. (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Seat belt buckle not functioning as intended Middle row nearside belt buckle not releasing freely. (7.1.2 (d))
Offside Front Brake pedal anti-slip provision loose Refitted brake pedal rubber partially detached. (1.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Side repeater lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Lens damaged. (4.4.1 (b) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule Ferrules to both rear brake hoses corroding. (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Rear suspension arms and components are corroding. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front door mirror indicator lens damaged
Offside Front tyre bald inner edge
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Outer Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front door mirror indicator lens damaged
Offside Front tyre bald inner edge
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension component corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front tyre bald inner edge
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front tyre bald inner edge
Central Seat belt installation has cut and/or reworked original webbing (10.1 (a))
Nearside Rear Seat belt installation has cut and/or reworked original webbing (10.1 (a))
Offside Rear Seat belt installation has cut and/or reworked original webbing (10.1 (a))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front tyre bald inner edge
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front tyre bald inner edge
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Engine undercover fitted obscuring some underside components
Front number plate deteriorating (not likely to be misread)
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 3mm (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1) DANGEROUS
Front Service brake juddering severely (3.7.C.2)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CP61 FWB is a 2011 Volvo XC90 in Grey with a 2,400cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.9%.
Across all 2011 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.0% with a typical mileage of 85,814 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CP61 FWB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 15 years old, this Volvo XC90 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CP61 FWB?
You can check the full history of CP61 FWB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CP61 FWB registered?
CP61 FWB is a 2011 Volvo XC90, first registered on 28 November 2011.
Is CP61 FWB safe to buy?
The MOT history for CP61 FWB shows 21 tests with a 61.9% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CP61 FWB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CP61 FWB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.