MOT Status
ValidMileage
82,308 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
vehicle heavily undershield
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
emmisions eventually crept into pass criteria.
windscreen washer bottle leaking.
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and attached components. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.1.3 (g) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and attached components. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Nail in tyre (wood splinter) ()
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and all attached conponants. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear chassis near subframe has general corrosion N/S/R and O/S/R (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Both front headlamps. (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Headlamp levelling device inoperative (4.1.5 (a))
Nearside Front Inner Nail in tyre (wood splinter) ()
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and all attached conponants. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Rear chassis near subframe has general corrosion N/S/R and O/S/R (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and all attached components. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
engine mil light illuminated...tested only 1/7/2008 on.
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))
Nearside Front Headlamp levelling device inoperative (4.1.5 (a))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear compliance bush . (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn rear compliance bush. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened corroded and holed below coil spring seat. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Service brake binding but not excessively both front. (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened and all attached components. (5.3.3 (b) (i))
engine mil light illuminated...tested only 1/7/2008 on.
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front arm rear compliance bushes. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
rear subframe and all attached components corroded but within pass criteria.
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front armrear compliance bushes deteriorated and have slight movement. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
general surface corrosion on rear subframe and suspension components.
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front wishbone rear compliance bushes worn resulting in slight movement. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn and excessivly corroded on inner faces. (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front wishbone rear compliance bushes worn resulting in slight movement. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both tyre treads approx 2mm and scrubbed on outer edges. (5.2.3 (e))
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened excessively corroded. (3.5.1i)
underside very muddy.
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened inner faces both sides corroded (3.5.1i)
plasic covers fitted resticting access to components for inspection.
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened inner faces both sides corroded (3.5.1i)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low and too far to the left. (1.8)
Offside Headlamp aim too low and too far to the left. (1.8)
plasic covers fitted resticting access to components for inspection.
Front Headlamp aim aimed so that it dazzles other road users (1.8.A.1a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
both front tyres worn to aprox 2.8mm in tread depth
rear exhaust support brackets slightly corroded
Front Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Anti-roll bar has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
front wipers starting to smear screen
n/s/r tyre worn unevenly upto 1.6 mm
How Reliable is the Ford Focus C-max?
Based on 1,326,487 MOT tests across 79,932 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CT04 GNX is a 2004 Ford Focus C-max in Silver with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 28 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 71.4%.
Across all 2004 Ford Focus C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.1% with a typical mileage of 75,889 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Focus C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,238 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CT04 GNX, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Focus C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 22 years old, this Ford Focus C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CT04 GNX?
You can check the full history of CT04 GNX by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CT04 GNX registered?
CT04 GNX is a 2004 Ford Focus C-max, first registered on 27 July 2004.
Is CT04 GNX safe to buy?
The MOT history for CT04 GNX shows 28 tests with a 71.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CT04 GNX have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CT04 GNX. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.