MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
181,607 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced offside and nearside (1.7.5a)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear tyre worn on inner edge
Offside Front tyre worn on inner edge
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Brake hose twisted (3.6.B.4c)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Brake hydraulic reservoir fluid close to minimum level (3.6.G.1b)
Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced offside and nearside (1.7.5a)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear tyre worn on inner edge
Offside Front tyre worn on inner edge
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output GLASS OPACITY (1.7.5a)
Offside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output GLASS OPACITY (1.7.5a)
ROW 3 (seats 6&7 ) NOT AVAILABLE FOR FULL INSPECTION of TESTABLE ITEMS
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front slight up and down play in the steering rack
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement front and rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement front and rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Inner Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both rear suspension arm inner bush's (2.4.G.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Headlamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp no beam pattern due lens detrition (1.7.5c)
Offside Front Front position lamp(s) not working side light (1.1.A.3b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.C.1b)
Rear Parking brake lever has no reserve travel (3.1.6b)
Front registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Front slight up and down play in the steering rack
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement front and rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced lens deteriorated borderline on the beam pattern (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement front and rear bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear Inner Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both rear suspension arm inner bush's (2.4.G.2)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
both front lower suspension arm rear bushes splitting cloe to limit
both rear lower suspension arm rear inner bushes unbonding
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Tow ball/hitch not fitted at time of test
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
emissions to clean to register
Tow ball/hitch not fitted at time of test
exhaust coorded
front pads appear to be low
small cuts to osr inner tyre wall
stone chips in windscreen
Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Tow ball/hitch not fitted at time of test
exhaust coorded
front pads appear to be low
small cuts to osr inner tyre wall
stone chips in windscreen
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
both front lower arm bushes age cracking
both rear lower arm inner bushes starting to unbond
stone chips in windscreen
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
both front lower arm bushes age cracking
both rear lower arm inner bushes starting to unbond
stone chips in windscreen
bonnet retaining catch stiff
front brake discs corroded on inner faces
rear brake discs corroded
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CT55 DTO is a 2005 Volvo XC90 in Green with a 2,401cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.3%.
Across all 2005 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.2% with a typical mileage of 106,315 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CT55 DTO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 21 years old, this Volvo XC90 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CT55 DTO?
You can check the full history of CT55 DTO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CT55 DTO registered?
CT55 DTO is a 2005 Volvo XC90, first registered on 23 November 2005.
Is CT55 DTO safe to buy?
The MOT history for CT55 DTO shows 15 tests with a 73.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CT55 DTO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CT55 DTO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.