MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
67,567 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front shock absorber lower mounting cup s corroded
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front lower shock absorber mounting cup corroded
Steering box has a slight oil leak (2.2.D.2e)
deterioration in both rear tyres
play in steering box or shaft ?
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement also mounting cups corroded away (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement also mounting cup corroded away (2.4.G.2)
deterioration in both rear tyres
play in steering box or shaft?
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.C.1b)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement also mounting cups corroded away (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement also mounting cup corroded away (2.4.G.2)
deterioration in both rear tyres
offside rear brake binding
play in steering box or shaft?
Nearside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement also mounting cup (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Lower Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush also mounting cup (2.7.4)
Offside Front Lower Anti-roll bar linkage rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement also mounting cup (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush also mounting cup (2.7.4)
front discs pitting inner face
n/s/r tyre cracks in sidewall
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside Brake pipe inadequately supported (3.6.B.1)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively deteriorated so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
front discs pitting inner face
n/s/r tyre cracks in sidewall
o/s/f brake pipe on caliper slight damage
front brake discs corroded
front tyres worn on edges
nearside inner sill corroded
slight lift in both kingpins
wipers poor
Front Axle king pin has excessive play in pin and/or bush adversely affecting the steering (2.5.A.3a)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Lower Shock absorber has a slightly worn bush (2.7.4)
front discs pitting
front tyres wear on edges
n/s/ inner sill corrosion
slight knock n/s/f s/idler
some lift in king pins + 3 flex hoses soft
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
advanced corrosion to n/s front footwell
heavy corrosion to o/s and n/s front inner wings and arch area
unable to carry out full inspection of under side of vehicle due to heavy wax oil
Nearside rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Offside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
advanced corrosion to n/s front footwell
heavy corrosion to o/s and n/s front inner wings and arch area
unable to carry out full inspection of under side of vehicle due to heavy wax oil
How Reliable is the Rover 95?
Based on 2,547 MOT tests across 301 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CTD 277B is a 1964 Rover 95 in Grey with a 2,626cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70.6%.
Across all 1964 Rover 95 models, the average MOT pass rate is 80.9% with a typical mileage of 54,322 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Rover 95 fails its MOT is brake binding, accounting for 116 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CTD 277B, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Rover 95 typically stays on UK roads for around 64 years. At 62 years old, this Rover 95 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CTD 277B?
You can check the full history of CTD 277B by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CTD 277B registered?
CTD 277B is a 1964 Rover 95, first registered on 4 January 1964.
Is CTD 277B safe to buy?
The MOT history for CTD 277B shows 17 tests with a 70.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CTD 277B have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CTD 277B. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.