MOT Status
ValidMileage
173,892 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened heavy corrosion (5.3.3 (b) (i))
coil springs corroded
front brake discs corroded
front tyres wearing unevenly to markers
general underbody corrosion
handbrake efficiency poor
o/s/f seat switch panel damaged
outer boot release stiff
rear chassis around rear subframe mountings corroded
rear suspension components corroded (heavy corrosion)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
coil springs corroded
front brake discs corroded
general underbody corrosion
indicator switch worn
o/s/f seat control panel damaged
rear suspension arms bushes worn
rear suspension components corroded
Nearside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn lower trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Side repeater not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn lower trailing arm (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
coil springs corroded
front brake discs corroded
general underbody corrosion
indicator switch worn
o/s/f seat control panel damaged
rear suspension arms bushes worn
rear suspension components corroded
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
coil springs heavily corroded
front brake discs heavily corroded on inner braking surfaces
general underbody corrosion
rear suspension arms bushes perished/worn
rear suspension components corroded
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
coil springs heavily corroded
excessive amounts of dirt/mud under vehicle covering testable items
front brake discs heavily corroded on inner braking surfaces
general underbody corrosion
headlamp images becoming poor
rear suspension arms bushes perished/worn
rear suspension components corroded
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
anti-skid service warning on dash display
coil springs corroded
exhaust corroded
general underbody corrosion
metal brake pipe unions corroded
rear suspension arms rubber bushes deteriorated
rear suspension components heavily corroded
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front brake discs corroded
rear suspension components corroded
rear tyres wearing unevenly with cuts in tread
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
front brake discs corroded
rear suspension components corroded
rear tyres wearing unevenly with cuts in tread
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Central Rear Seat belt not functioning as intended (7.1.2 (c))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
drivers seat bottom controls poor
service lights on dash
under trays fitted
boot release lever partly seized,advise attention
corrosion starting around rear subframe to floor plates
drivers seat control broken (advise attention asap due to sharp edges )
service warnings on dash display
Horn not working (7.7 (a) (ii))
boot release lever partly seized,advise attention
corrosion starting around rear subframe to floor plates
drivers seat control broken (advise attention asap due to sharp edges )
service warnings on dash display
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Exhaust emits an excessive level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine (7.4.B.3b)
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement REAR BOTH (2.4.G.2)
HEADLAMP BEAM IMAGE POOR
FRONT LOWER SUSPENSION ARM BUSHES PARTLY DETACHED
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.C.1b)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
n/s/f tyre wearing on outer edge
o/s/f and n/s/f lower suspension arm rear bushes deteriorated
n/s/f tyre wearing on outer edge
o/s/f and n/s/f lower suspension arm rear bushes deteriorated
o/s/f and n/s/f lower suspension arm rear bushes deteriorated/split
o/s/r tyre wearing on edges/near legal limit
rear suspension bushes deteriorated
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
n/s/f outer sidelight not working
o/s/f and n/s/f lower suspension arm rear bushes deteriorated/split
o/s/r tyre wearing on edges/near legal limit
rear suspension bushes deteriorated
Nearside Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front brake disc excessively pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CU54 LCC is a 2005 Volvo XC90 in Silver with a 2,401cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 30 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.3%.
Across all 2005 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.2% with a typical mileage of 106,315 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CU54 LCC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 21 years old, this Volvo XC90 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CU54 LCC?
You can check the full history of CU54 LCC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CU54 LCC registered?
CU54 LCC is a 2005 Volvo XC90, first registered on 6 January 2005.
Is CU54 LCC safe to buy?
The MOT history for CU54 LCC shows 30 tests with a 63.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CU54 LCC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CU54 LCC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.