MOT Status
ValidMileage
75,392 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Wheel bearing slightly noisy both (5.1.3 (b) (i))
advise : heavy surface corrosion to both rear axle mounting brackets
advise : slight play in both front top strut mount/bearings
advise : surface corrosion to both outer sills
advise : surface corrosion to outer sills and rear suspension arms
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
advise : surface corrosion to outer sills and rear suspension arms
Anti-lock braking system component slightly damaged (1.6 (e))
advise ; surface corrosion to front and rear suspesion arms
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Shock absorbers damaged to the extent that it does not function corroded (5.3.2 (b))
advise ; surface corrosion to front and rear suspesion arms
advise : heavy surface corrosion to both outer sills to under floor areas
advise : heavy surface corrosion to front and rear suspension units
Rear Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure both (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect both (4.1.2 (c))
Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure both (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
advise : heavy surface corrosion to both outer sills to under floor areas
advise : heavy surface corrosion to front and rear suspension units
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened ALL FRONT & REAR (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Coil spring corroded ALL F&R (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened BOTH (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement BOTH (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material BOTH (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test two from the center and two from the rear ()
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear sub frame mount (6.1.1 (c) (i))
all rear seats missing at time of test
Offside Front Outer Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both front worn on inner edges (4.1.E.1)
Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test
Offside Front Upper Macpherson strut insecure (2.4.G.1) DANGEROUS
Front Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test
All rear seats removed from vehicle at time of test.
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
All rear seats removed from vehicle at time of test.
Rear Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
How Reliable is the Seat Alhambra?
Based on 690,916 MOT tests across 54,940 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CV52 HPY is a 2002 Seat Alhambra in Silver with a 1,896cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 79.2%.
Across all 2002 Seat Alhambra models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.5% with a typical mileage of 105,771 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Seat Alhambra fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 23,231 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CV52 HPY, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Seat Alhambra typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 24 years old, this Seat Alhambra is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CV52 HPY?
You can check the full history of CV52 HPY by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CV52 HPY registered?
CV52 HPY is a 2002 Seat Alhambra, first registered on 1 September 2002.
Is CV52 HPY safe to buy?
The MOT history for CV52 HPY shows 24 tests with a 79.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CV52 HPY have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CV52 HPY. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.