MOT Status
ValidMileage
75,874 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush steering rack shock (5.3.2 (c))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play front (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Cab or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a cab mounting (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Front Cab or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a cab mounting strut mount (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe inadequately clipped or supported (1.1.11 (d) (i))
under body corrosion
Nearside Rear Cab or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a cab mounting (6.2.2 (d) (i))
under body corrosion
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
under body corrosion
Brake pedal has insufficient reserve travel (1.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has excessive play hub excessive play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe likely to become detached or damaged (1.1.11 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Upper Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front hub excessive oil leak from oil seal
Rear Anti-roll bar pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement all (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened all suspension components (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced chassis (all) (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle structure or chassis corroded within 30cm of a mounting, but not seriously affecting overall security chassis (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all round (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
under body corrosion
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened all round (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material all brake pipe covered in wax oil (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the light source but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
wax oil all over the chassis
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
all underside and components covered in wax oil
n/s/f headlamp lense deteriorated
Nearside Front Steering component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded chassis (2.1.2 (e) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced rear crossmember (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Towbar excessively corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting rear crossmsmber (6.1.6 (i) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
all underside and components covered in waxoil making corrosion inspection difficult
centre and rear exhaust corroded
n/s/f headlight lense deteriorated
Front Oil leak, but not excessive engine (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Oil leak, but not excessive hub (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
both front coil springs corroded
both front inner wing brake pipes slight corrosion
centre and rear exhaust flanges corroded
engine has oil leaks
slight tear in nearside wiper blade
engine has oil leaks
exhaust centre flanges corroded
slight wear on front brake discs
Service brake is causing the vehicle to swerve to the nearside (3.7.C.2)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
engine has oil leaks
exhaust centre flanges corroded
slight wear on front brake discs
exhaust centre and rear flanges corroded
front brake pads getting low
Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
engine has oil leaks
exhaust centre and rear flange corroded
offside rear brake pad getting low
rear brake discs corroded on inner face
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
engine has oil leak
slight corrosion to exhaust centre and rear
Centre Rear Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
slight tear on offside wiper blade
How Reliable is the Land Rover Defender?
Based on 2,960,045 MOT tests across 181,953 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
CX02 XAT is a 2002 Land Rover Defender in Green with a 2,495cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 25 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 2002 Land Rover Defender models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.1% with a typical mileage of 91,689 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Land Rover Defender fails its MOT is shock absorber has an excessively worn bush, accounting for 77,499 recorded failures. If you're considering buying CX02 XAT, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Land Rover Defender typically stays on UK roads for around 43 years. At 24 years old, this Land Rover Defender is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of CX02 XAT?
You can check the full history of CX02 XAT by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was CX02 XAT registered?
CX02 XAT is a 2002 Land Rover Defender, first registered on 9 April 2002.
Is CX02 XAT safe to buy?
The MOT history for CX02 XAT shows 25 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does CX02 XAT have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on CX02 XAT. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.