MOT Status
ValidMileage
73,329 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both disc front (n/s/f,o/s/f) (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin both sides front (n/s/f,o/s/f) (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front pipes corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Front Coil spring corroded both spring front (n/s/f,o/s/f) (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush both sides (n/s/f,o/s/f) (5.3.2 (c))
Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both sides front (n/s/f,o/s/f),upper and lower (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in an anchor pin and/or bush both sides rear (n/s/r,o/s/r) (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring shackle bracket corroded but not seriously weakened both sides rear (n/s/r,o/s/r) (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. both sides rear (n/s/r,o/s/r) (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Shock absorbers has slight external damage to the casing both sides rear ,(n/s/r,o/s/r),corroded (5.3.2 (b))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced both sides ,front and rear (6.1.1 (c) (i))
parking break lever slight travel
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Front Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both sides, upper & lower (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush both (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively both (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Rear brake back plates corroded
Rear cross member corroded
Rear shock shrouds corroded insecure
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
front & rear chassis areas etc corroded
rear of fuel tank to cross member racket holed/badly corroded
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Rear Service brake requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair (1.2.1 (c))
Rear both shock absorber shrouds corroded/detatched
Rear brake back plates corroded
Rear fuel tank to cross member support corroded/sealed over-unable to inspect fully
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
cross member corroded
front & rear chassis ares etc corroded
front & rear suspension components corroded
front upper & lower suspension arms corroded
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
chassis corroded
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
chassis corroded
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material main (1.1.11 (c))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab?
Based on 774,794 MOT tests across 49,827 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DF59 OWJ is a 2010 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab in Black with a 2,477cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 87.5%.
Across all 2010 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.7% with a typical mileage of 88,561 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,357 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DF59 OWJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 16 years old, this Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DF59 OWJ?
You can check the full history of DF59 OWJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DF59 OWJ registered?
DF59 OWJ is a 2010 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, first registered on 17 February 2010.
Is DF59 OWJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for DF59 OWJ shows 16 tests with a 87.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DF59 OWJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DF59 OWJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.