MOT Status
ValidMileage
53,374 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
general underbody corrosion
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced general underbody (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Offside Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
UNDER VEHICLE SHOWING SIGNS OF CORROSION
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Wheel apron (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Seat belt missing (7.1.2 (a))
front sub frame advanced corrosion.
offside and nearside wheel arches advanced corrosion rear
Brake pipe slightly corroded SEVERAL INC BOTH REAR (3.6.B.2c)
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated BOTH POOR SUGGEST REPLACE (3.6.B.4d)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin BOTH SIDES (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened BOTH (3.5.1i)
HEAVY CORROSION INC SUSPENSION , SUBFRAME ,FLOOR /INNER SILLS INC OLD REPAIRS ,EXHAUST, REAR ARCHES, COIL SPRINGS.
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive OUTER SILL (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive OUTER SILL (2.4.A.3)
Oil leak ()
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded INNER SILL / FLOOR (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded FLOOR (5.2.6)
Brake pipe slightly corroded SEVERAL INC BOTH REAR (3.6.B.2c)
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated BOTH POOR SUGGEST REPLACE (3.6.B.4d)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin BOTH SIDES (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened BOTH (3.5.1i)
HEAVY CORROSION INC SUSPENSION , SUBFRAME ,FLOOR /INNER SILLS INC OLD REPAIRS ,EXHAUST, REAR ARCHES, COIL SPRINGS.
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive OUTER SILL (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive OUTER SILL (2.4.A.3)
Oil leak ()
Brake hose slightly deteriorated both front (3.6.B.4d)
corrosion - rear arches - off side front floor - suspension - exhaust
corrosion through car - sills - inner sills
rear wiper split - near side front wheel dent
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
corrosion - both outer sills - both rear wheel arches - both rear chassis legs - front suspension - handbrake cable - front exhaust - rear wheel arches have inner covers
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
corrosion - both outer sills - both rear wheel arches - both rear chassis legs - front suspension - handbrake cable - front exhaust - rear wheel arches have inner covers
near side tyre pressures were down
corrosion - suspension - off side front floor - rear inner and outer sills - rear chassis legs - rear arches - exhaust
Nail in offside rear tyre
corrosion - front crossmember - rear inner sills - exhaust
rear tyres cracks poor
rear tyres cracks
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
rear tyres cracks
Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
corrosion inc front subframe poor,floor/inner sills,metal brake pipes have been cleaned & treated.
rear tyres age cracking
both near side tyre sidewalls poor.
oil leak selector seal ?
start corrosion inc o/s/r metal brake pipe
start corrosion metal brake pipes
How Reliable is the Ford Puma?
Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DG02 YWR is a 2002 Ford Puma in Blue with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 83.3%.
Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DG02 YWR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DG02 YWR?
You can check the full history of DG02 YWR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DG02 YWR registered?
DG02 YWR is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 26 March 2002.
Is DG02 YWR safe to buy?
The MOT history for DG02 YWR shows 24 tests with a 83.3% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DG02 YWR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DG02 YWR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.