MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
99,033 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Exhaust emissions exceed level of metered smoke for a turbo charged engine 2.28 mean recorded , manufacturers plate limit is 1.19 (8.2.2.2 (b))
Nearside Brake pipe excessively corroded Centre . (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Brake modification unsafe Compression type joint fitted which is not suitable . (1.1.21 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Chassis leg corroded and holed by shock absorber . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Inner of chassis leg above rear of front subframe is corroded and holed . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Inner wing corroded and holed . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Central Brake pipe leaking on a hydraulic braking system Leaking on corroded area . (1.1.11 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Body component likely to become detached Bump stop . (6.2.1 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Exhaust emits excessive smoke or vapour but not likely to obscure the vision of other road users Thick black smoke noted on acceleration . (8.2.2.2 (c))
Lower Integral body structure is repaired but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Unable to inspect some repairs due to liberal application of underseal . (6.1.1 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Corroded . (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Brake pipe inadequately clipped or supported (1.1.11 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Inner wheel arch behind front wheel is corroded and holed . (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Inner of chassis leg above rear of subframe is heavily corroded . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Bump stop missing .
Nearside Rear reflector not red in colour Orange reflector fitted and not red . (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake pipe inadequately clipped or supported (1.1.11 (d) (i))
Offside Front Bumper mountings corroded but not likely to become detached (6.1.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Chassis leg under bonnet heavily corroded . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Inner and outer sill at bottom of b post is corroded and holed . (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear Rear reflector not red in colour Orange reflector fitted and not red . (4.8.2 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Chassis leg corroded heavily and swollen by bump stop mounting . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Repair plate on inner sill is not seam welded .
Oil leak, but not excessive Engine . (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material Brake pipes on axle are greased up . (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 25% recorded , nearside rear effort is lower than offside rear effort . (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Rear Parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. Both sides . (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both sides corroded near to shackle mountings . (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner wheel arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner wheel arch (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced outer sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear bump stop deteriorated
Offside Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Rear bump stop deteriorated
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material metal brake pipe to master cylinder (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material metal brake pipe to master cylinder (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Inner corrosion to structure
Nearside Inner Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Outer Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Rear Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings body mount in front of wheel (6.1.B.2)
Offside Inner Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings sill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Outer Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings suill (6.1.B.2)
Offside Rear Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings body mount in front of wheel (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Body has slight corrosion near side sill (6.1.B.2)
How Reliable is the Ford Transit?
Based on 16,371,688 MOT tests across 1,454,648 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DG52 KBE is a 2003 Ford Transit in White with a 2,402cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 10 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 2003 Ford Transit models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.7% with a typical mileage of 108,242 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Transit fails its MOT is registration plate lamp not working, accounting for 551,926 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DG52 KBE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Transit typically stays on UK roads for around 37 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Transit is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DG52 KBE?
You can check the full history of DG52 KBE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DG52 KBE registered?
DG52 KBE is a 2003 Ford Transit, first registered on 21 January 2003.
Is DG52 KBE safe to buy?
The MOT history for DG52 KBE shows 10 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DG52 KBE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DG52 KBE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.