MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
91,012 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement offside and nearside bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside rear bushes de-bonding slightly (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Inner wheel arch liners fitted obscuring some components/prescribed areas
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2mm on outer edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive gearbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Steering rack has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.3 (a) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened surface corrosion to front subframe (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened surface corrosion to front arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chips (3.2 (a) (i))
one rear exhaust mounting broken. ADVISE REPLACEMENT NOW
All direction indicators not working (4.4.1 (a) (ii))
Front Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement offside and nearside bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Offside and nearside rear bushes de-bonding slightly (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Inner wheel arch liners fitted obscuring some components/prescribed areas
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2mm on outer edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive gearbox (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Steering rack has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.3 (a) (i))
Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened surface corrosion to front subframe (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened surface corrosion to front arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view chips (3.2 (a) (i))
one rear exhaust mounting broken. ADVISE REPLACEMENT NOW
Nearside Front Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rearmost (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rearmost (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Front Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) insecure Spring retainer not secure under brake caliper (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint dust cover excessively damaged so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Boot split (2.2.C.1c)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) insecure Spring retainer not secure under brake caliper (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear coil spring broken Lower coil missing (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Front Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rearmost (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Sub-frame rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rearmost (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Inner face (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush (2.4.G.2)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Nearside Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (2.7.3)
Nearside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.5.C.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
inner arch covers fitted.
Inner wheel arch covers fitted.
Nearside Rear tyre has a nail in it.
Rear exhaust rubber mounting deterioration.
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Direction indicators not working (1.4.A.2c)
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (1.7.5a)
Nearside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Centre Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
How Reliable is the Seat Leon?
Based on 3,000,659 MOT tests across 265,838 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DG52 LFP is a 2003 Seat Leon in Grey with a 1,390cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 13 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69.2%.
Across all 2003 Seat Leon models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.5% with a typical mileage of 80,078 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Seat Leon fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,909 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DG52 LFP, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Seat Leon typically stays on UK roads for around 26 years. At 23 years old, this Seat Leon is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DG52 LFP?
You can check the full history of DG52 LFP by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DG52 LFP registered?
DG52 LFP is a 2003 Seat Leon, first registered on 31 January 2003.
Is DG52 LFP safe to buy?
The MOT history for DG52 LFP shows 13 tests with a 69.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DG52 LFP have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DG52 LFP. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.