MOT Status
ValidMileage
65,155 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced slight underneath in places (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced slight underneath in places (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage pump area (2.1.5 (a))
underneath showing sighs of corrosion/rust
Front and rear suspension components corroded
Nearside Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive and offside inner sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear exhaust flange corroded
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
chassis and under body suspension components corroded
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge and both rears all deteriorated (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure 195 x 60 x 15 (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tie bar/rod attachment bracket/mounting nut missing Incomplete (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front Tie bar/rod attachment bracket/mounting nut missing Incomplete (2.4.G.1)
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a pin/bush Both sides D bushes (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Outer Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Outer Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear registration plate faded but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
front brake discs beginning to corrode on inner contact surfaces
nearside outer frontdrop link rubber bush deteriated but not resulting in excessive movement
offside outer front drop link rubber bush deteriated but not resulting in excessive movement
rear reg plate deteriated but not likely to be misread
Nearside Outer Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Offside Outer Front Anti-roll bar rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear coil spring corroded (2.4.C.1b)
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
osf wiper split but not affecting drivers view of the road
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi Lancer?
Based on 382,912 MOT tests across 33,260 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DG55 EHB is a 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer in Grey with a 1,584cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 85.7%.
Across all 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 60,560 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi Lancer fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 9,095 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DG55 EHB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi Lancer typically stays on UK roads for around 30 years. At 21 years old, this Mitsubishi Lancer is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DG55 EHB?
You can check the full history of DG55 EHB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DG55 EHB registered?
DG55 EHB is a 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer, first registered on 6 September 2005.
Is DG55 EHB safe to buy?
The MOT history for DG55 EHB shows 21 tests with a 85.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DG55 EHB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DG55 EHB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.