MOT Status
ValidMileage
75,659 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Vehicle has been under sealed
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both fronts (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Outer cv boot very slightly deteriorated
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre inner edge ()
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both fronts (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Front Outer cv boot very slightly deteriorated
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre inner edge ()
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both fronts (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre inner edge ()
engine sump corroded slight oil leak
Nearside Rear Outer Vehicle structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting sill (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Offside Rear Outer Vehicle structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting sill (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material both fronts (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Nail in tyre inner edge ()
engine sump corroded slight oil leak
Front Subframe Slight Corrosion
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Sump Corroded
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Nearside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
offside wing/sill damaged covered in tape
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play not noticed due to heavy track rod movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front position light flickers slightly
Offside Front wing/sill area covered with tape, corrosion seems present, not within 30 cm of load bearing point, further investigation advised
Offside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
power steering heavy when first started, further investigation advised
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front position light flickers slightly
Offside Front wing/sill area covered with tape, corrosion seems present, not within 30 cm of load bearing point, further investigation advised
Offside Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
power steering heavy when first started, further investigation advised
Nearside Front Inner slight play on tie rod
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Lower Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Lower Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced just on surface (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play advise replacement (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Body component slightly loose wing area (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower corrosion outer sill area, covered with tape, unable to assess correctly, further investigation strongly advised
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front wing/lower sill area heavy corroded and covered with tape, unable to correctly assess due to tape covering, corrosion can be felt under neath tape, not within 30 cm of a load bearing point/strongly advise further investiagtion
middle exhaust heat shield insecure, strongly advise replacement/repair
Offside Rear Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has slight play advise replacement (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing heavy perished, advise replacement (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Body component slightly loose wing area (6.2.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower corrosion outer sill area, covered with tape, unable to assess correctly, further investigation strongly advised
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing heavy perished, advise replacement (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Offside Front wing/lower sill area heavy corroded and covered with tape, unable to correctly assess due to tape covering, corrosion can be felt under neath tape, not within 30 cm of a load bearing point/strongly advise further investiagtion
middle exhaust heat shield insecure, strongly advise replacement/repair
Offside Front Outer Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords over 10 years old + cracking slightly (5.2.3 (d) (i))
front brake discs corroded
offside front wing corroded
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both (3.5.1i)
Offside front tyre perished
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both (3.5.1i)
Offside front tyre perished
both rear tyres slightly perished
nail nearside rear tyre
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Child seat fitted not allowing full inspection of adult belt
Vehicle's internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights
How Reliable is the Mazda 2?
Based on 1,902,862 MOT tests across 147,013 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DG59 CWK is a 2009 Mazda 2 in Blue with a 1,349cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2009 Mazda 2 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.2% with a typical mileage of 59,522 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda 2 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 18,380 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DG59 CWK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda 2 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 17 years old, this Mazda 2 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DG59 CWK?
You can check the full history of DG59 CWK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DG59 CWK registered?
DG59 CWK is a 2009 Mazda 2, first registered on 10 September 2009.
Is DG59 CWK safe to buy?
The MOT history for DG59 CWK shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DG59 CWK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DG59 CWK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.