MOT Status
ValidMileage
163,617 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Battery insecure and likely to cause a short circuit (4.13 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Upper Suspension component ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear fog lamp not working (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
all tyers poor
various amount of corrosion underside of vehiacl
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded all 3 brake pipes (yellow chalked) (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength chassis cross member ( yellow chalked) (5.3.6 (a) (i))
all tyers poor
various amount of corrosion underside of vehiacl
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded front to rear b/pipe *as marked* (above fuel tank) (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded rear to rear b/pipe *as marked* (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded rear to rear b/pipe *as marked* (1.1.11 (c))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier held on with cable ties (4.13 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner sills corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge all 4 tyres wearing low on tread (5.2.3 (e))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced all underbody chassis corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
all underbody suspension components corroded
majority of underbody sprayed in black underseal
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded front to rear b/pipe *as marked* (above fuel tank) (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded rear to rear b/pipe *as marked* (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak (5.3.2 (b))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded rear to rear b/pipe *as marked* (1.1.11 (c))
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier held on with cable ties (4.13 (a) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced inner sills corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge all 4 tyres wearing low on tread (5.2.3 (e))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced all underbody chassis corrosion (6.1.1 (c) (i))
all underbody suspension components corroded
majority of underbody sprayed in black underseal
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers has light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
vehicle undersealed
Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material front to rear (1.1.11 (c))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Offside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Leaf spring fractured (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Road wheel fixing missing (5.2.1 (a) (i))
Rear fog lamp missing (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Nearside Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp missing (4.5.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Wheel bearing play so excessive it is likely to break up (5.1.3 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Offside Front Brake pipe corroded, covered in grease or other material (1.1.11 (c))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab?
Based on 774,794 MOT tests across 49,827 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DG61 SXZ is a 2011 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab in Black with a 2,972cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 62.5%.
Across all 2011 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.3% with a typical mileage of 87,384 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,357 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DG61 SXZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 15 years old, this Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DG61 SXZ?
You can check the full history of DG61 SXZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DG61 SXZ registered?
DG61 SXZ is a 2011 Mitsubishi L200 Double Cab, first registered on 20 September 2011.
Is DG61 SXZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for DG61 SXZ shows 16 tests with a 62.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DG61 SXZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DG61 SXZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.