MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
111,633 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded chassis (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded inner wheel arch area (5.2.6)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded body sill area (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded inner wheel arch area (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded body sill area (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle Axle 2 (3.7.B.5b)
Offside Front Wheel nut(s) loose all 4 (4.2.A.1e) DANGEROUS
Offside Rear Wheel nut(s) loose all 4 (4.2.A.1e) DANGEROUS
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened and lower (2.4.G.1)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area repaired, but not inappropriately wheel arch area ( unable to assess repair ) (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened and lower (2.4.G.1)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened and lower (2.4.G.1)
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive inner wheel arch area (5.2.6)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area repaired, but not inappropriately wheel arch area ( unable to assess repair ) (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Upper Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened and lower (2.4.G.1)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Body filler/fiber glass in the offside rear lower outer sill
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Front and rear lower suspension arms have slight corrosion
Nearside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
Body filler/fiber glass in offside rear sill
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Chassis leg around anti roll bar mount (2.4.A.3)
Nearside rear tyre soft
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded Outer sill (5.2.6)
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded Chassis leg around anti roll bar mount (2.4.A.3)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Body filler/fiber glass in offside rear sill
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Chassis leg around anti roll bar mount (2.4.A.3)
Nearside rear tyre soft
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Exhaust noisy (7.1.4)
Rear Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Underside of vehicle dry and flakey with rust
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Brake hydraulic reservoir fluid close to minimum level (3.6.G.1b)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Underside of vehicle dry and flakey with rust
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Vehicle structure has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
front brake pads getting below half way down
Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (2.4.G.1)
handbrake pulls up high/surface corrosion to offside front to rear brake pipe
How Reliable is the Mazda MX-5?
Based on 2,502,760 MOT tests across 160,823 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DK52 PCF is a 2002 Mazda MX-5 in Silver with a 1,598cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 16 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.8%.
Across all 2002 Mazda MX-5 models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.1% with a typical mileage of 66,854 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda MX-5 fails its MOT is seat belt anchorage prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 44,475 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DK52 PCF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda MX-5 typically stays on UK roads for around 36 years. At 24 years old, this Mazda MX-5 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DK52 PCF?
You can check the full history of DK52 PCF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DK52 PCF registered?
DK52 PCF is a 2002 Mazda MX-5, first registered on 3 September 2002.
Is DK52 PCF safe to buy?
The MOT history for DK52 PCF shows 16 tests with a 68.8% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DK52 PCF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DK52 PCF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.