MOT Status
ValidMileage
233,289 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement arm rear bush perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
various areas of corrosion under vehicle
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Nearside and Offside front (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Nearside and Offside front suspension arm rear bush worn ... (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Nearside and Offside front + lip (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive *rear diff seal .. *rear exhaust clamp + bracket corroded (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively Nearside and Offside front + lip (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Oil leak, but not excessive *rear diff seal .. *rear exhaust clamp + bracket corroded (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
middle to rear exhaust flange corroded
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
middle to rear exhaust flange corroded
Excess plaY in both inner track rod ends / steering rack
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened lower wishbones (both) (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both bald on inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.2.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Rear Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Excess plaY in both inner track rod ends / steering rack
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened lower wishbones (both) (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge Both bald on inner edges (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning (4.2.1 (a) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
undertrays fitted
Front Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Rear Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
undertrays fitted
centre to rear silencer exhaust corroded between flanges.
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened front and rear (3.5.1i)
both front shock absorber gaiters split
How Reliable is the Honda Cr-v?
Based on 4,177,643 MOT tests across 304,403 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DN60 ALU is a 2010 Honda Cr-v in Silver with a 2,199cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 2010 Honda Cr-v models, the average MOT pass rate is 82.9% with a typical mileage of 75,673 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda Cr-v fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 62,925 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DN60 ALU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda Cr-v typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 16 years old, this Honda Cr-v is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DN60 ALU?
You can check the full history of DN60 ALU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DN60 ALU registered?
DN60 ALU is a 2010 Honda Cr-v, first registered on 16 December 2010.
Is DN60 ALU safe to buy?
The MOT history for DN60 ALU shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DN60 ALU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DN60 ALU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.