MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
247,997 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread & de-laminating (0.1 (b))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement All rear suspension bushes worn/perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Floor pan& rear subframe corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Vehicle underbody very muddy/dirty
Rear Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread De-laminated (0.1 (b))
oil leak
rear brake ferrules
underside is dirty
Rear Registration plate inscription illegible (0.1 (b))
Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn both rear trailing arms marked in yellow (5.3.4 (a) (i))
oil leak
rear brake ferrules
underside is dirty
both front lower arm bushes are in very poor condition
both lower inner arm bushes are perished
both rear trailing arm bushes are in very poor condition
handbrake is very poor performance
osf and nsr tyres are getting low on tread
rear trailing bushes are worn
the underside is very dirty
Nearside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Slight PAS weep
rear brake pipes ferules are rusty
rear suspention lower arm inner bushes are soft
wishbone front bushes are soft
rear center seat belt buckle has gone past the stop!
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.C.1b)
rear brake pipes ferules are rusty
rear suspention lower arm inner bushes are soft
wishbone front bushes are soft
rear center seat belt buckle has gone past the stop!
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.D.4)
drivers seat belt slightly freyed
oil leak (under tray fitted unable to identify where from)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Offside Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded (3.6.B.4e)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.D.4)
drivers seat belt slightly freyed
oil leak (under tray fitted unable to identify where from)
Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Rear Trailing arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.D.4)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.D.4)
both rear trailing arm bushes slightly split and worn
driver seat belt slightly freyed
nearside rear height sensor linkage broken
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.D.4)
both rear trailing arm front bushes splitting and becoming un bonded
cut in offside front tyre outer side wall
drivers seat belt slightly freyed
slight play in steering rack or rack arm joints
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
rear trailing arm front bushes starting to split
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has excessive play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.D.4)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
front propshaft joint slightly worn
rear trailing arm front bushes starting to split
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Volvo XC90?
Based on 1,122,947 MOT tests across 82,375 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DS52 LNF is a 2003 Volvo XC90 in Silver with a 2,401cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 21 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.2%.
Across all 2003 Volvo XC90 models, the average MOT pass rate is 67.7% with a typical mileage of 102,129 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Volvo XC90 fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 23,030 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DS52 LNF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Volvo XC90 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 23 years old, this Volvo XC90 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DS52 LNF?
You can check the full history of DS52 LNF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DS52 LNF registered?
DS52 LNF is a 2003 Volvo XC90, first registered on 7 February 2003.
Is DS52 LNF safe to buy?
The MOT history for DS52 LNF shows 21 tests with a 76.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DS52 LNF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DS52 LNF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.