MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
86,006 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake disc worn, but not excessively All 4 (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin All appear half worn, restricted view of inners (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Fluid leak, but not excessive Coolant (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Lower and upper suspension arms inner bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both have inner edge wear and are perishing on tread (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both lower/outer/inner sills (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Brake disc worn, but not excessively All 4 (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Brake pad(s) wearing thin All appear half worn, restricted view of inners (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Fluid leak, but not excessive Coolant (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Lower and upper suspension arms inner bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing Both have inner edge wear and are perishing on tread (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both lower/outer/inner sills (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively corroded on inner face where not in full contact with pads (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective both oxidized not affecting beam image (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge wear (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge inner edge wear (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Shock absorbers light misting of oil or has limited damping effect both rear shocks have light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both rear tyres low on tread near excessive (5.2.3 (e))
Road wheel slightly distorted both rear inner rims (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively slight wear (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front tyres have shoulder wear (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge near excess (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge near excess (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view stone chip (3.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Front Electronic stability control component excessively damaged level sensor (7.12 (c))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively slight wear (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both front tyres have shoulder wear (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge near excess (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge near excess (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view stone chip (3.2 (a) (i))
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
near side front wiper blade deteriorated
Headlamp cleaning device inoperative (1.7.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Front registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Front registration plate not fixed vertically, or as close to vertical as is reasonably practical (6.3.2c)
Nearside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage damaged and seriously weakened broken (2.4.G.1)
Offside Registration plate lamp not working (1.1.C.1d)
Rear registration plate character(s) incorrectly spaced (6.3.4a)
Supplementary Restraint System warning lamp indicates a fault air bag light (5.4.2)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Centre Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Front Windscreen has damage to the swept area in excess of a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Headlamp aim too far to the right (1.8)
How Reliable is the Mazda RX-8?
Based on 304,386 MOT tests across 25,254 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DU54 RTZ is a 2004 Mazda RX-8 in Silver with a 2,616cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 63.6%.
Across all 2004 Mazda RX-8 models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.1% with a typical mileage of 50,944 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Mazda RX-8 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 20,515 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DU54 RTZ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Mazda RX-8 typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 22 years old, this Mazda RX-8 is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DU54 RTZ?
You can check the full history of DU54 RTZ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DU54 RTZ registered?
DU54 RTZ is a 2004 Mazda RX-8, first registered on 1 September 2004.
Is DU54 RTZ safe to buy?
The MOT history for DU54 RTZ shows 22 tests with a 63.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DU54 RTZ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DU54 RTZ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.