MOT Status
ValidMileage
185,468 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering fluid level below minimum (2.1.5 (b) (i))
Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage (2.1.5 (a))
Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing (1.1.2 (c))
Fuel tank leaking (6.1.3 (b) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Power steering fluid level below minimum (2.1.5 (b) (i))
Power steering pipe/hose has slight seepage (2.1.5 (a))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both outer edges and cracking (5.2.3 (e))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Headlamp lens slightly defective both (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Both sides rear tyres worn edges and getting low
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
high level stop light inop
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged and affecting the driver's view of the road (3.2 (a) (ii))
Both sides rear tyres worn edges and getting low
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
high level stop light inop
Both sides front tyres worn on edges
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened pads starting to get low (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Headlamp has a product on the light source but not seriously reducing light output Both sides front (4.1.4 (b))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing badly worn edges (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Road wheel slightly distorted (5.2.2 (c) (i))
Windscreen wiper blade defective Both sides front (3.4 (b) (i))
added 1.5 L of engine oil for exhaust emissions
brake pad warning light on dash
engine oil leaks
front discs badly lipped and worn pads ok
oil leaks
Nearside Front Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
front discs badly lipped and worn pads ok
oil leaks
n/s rear tyre has a nail in tread
o/s rear tyre perished and worn on inner edge
parking brake lever has little reserve travel
Direction indicator incorrect colour both rear (4.4.3 (a))
Offside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint likely to become detached (5.3.4 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
n/s rear tyre has a nail in tread
o/s rear tyre perished and worn on inner edge
parking brake lever has little reserve travel
Offside Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (4.4.3 (a))
front brake discs worn pads o/s getting low and n/s appear very low also pad warning on
hand brake lever travel
n/s front tyre getting low in tread and worn on inner edge
o/s front tyre starting to wear on inner edge
slight damage to n.s rear inner wheel rim
both front brake discs worn
hand brake lever travel
n/s rear inner wheel rim buckled damaged
Nearside Front Coil spring fractured or broken (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
both front brake discs worn
hand brake lever travel
n/s rear inner wheel rim buckled damaged
Parking brake lever has little reserve travel (3.1.6b)
both front tyres wearing on inner edges
both rear tyres starting to get low in treads and wearing on edges
Engine and transmission oil leaks
H.B.L
both front brake discs lipped pads low
both rear tyres just starting to get and wearing on edges
offside wiper getting poor
Brake pedal anti-slip provision missing (3.3.A.1b)
Nearside Rear Shock absorber has an excessively worn bush (2.7.4)
Offside Rear Shock absorber has an excessively worn bush (2.7.4)
Engine and transmission oil leaks
H.B.L
both front brake discs lipped pads low
both rear tyres just starting to get and wearing on edges
offside wiper getting poor
both rear tyres cracking in treads and wearing on edges also screw in o/s rear
n/s wiper blade poor
o/s no/plate light dim output
transmission oil leak o/s drive shaft seal
2x nails in o/s/r tyre
chip in windscreen zone-B
How Reliable is the Citroen Nemo?
Based on 279,608 MOT tests across 21,949 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DU59 CWN is a 2009 Citroen Nemo in Red with a 1,399cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 68.2%.
Across all 2009 Citroen Nemo models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.1% with a typical mileage of 76,934 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Citroen Nemo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 4,767 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DU59 CWN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen Nemo typically stays on UK roads for around 18 years. At 17 years old, this Citroen Nemo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DU59 CWN?
You can check the full history of DU59 CWN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DU59 CWN registered?
DU59 CWN is a 2009 Citroen Nemo, first registered on 7 September 2009.
Is DU59 CWN safe to buy?
The MOT history for DU59 CWN shows 22 tests with a 68.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DU59 CWN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DU59 CWN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.