MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
74,161 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting o/s outer sill (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Vehicle structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting outer sill all along (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Offside Rear Exhaust silencer likely to become detached back box strap corroded and broken (8.1.1 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Upper Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Driver's view of the road through the swept area of the windscreen significantly affected by an obstruction sun visor (3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Offside Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis and inner sills (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Outer Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge OUTER EDGE WORN (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
REAR CHASSIS CORRODED
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn bolt on (5.3.4 (a) (i))
All direction indicators slightly discoloured Both rear (4.4.3 (a))
Rear Springs Corroded
Both Front Tyres worn on inner edges
Nearside Front Inner brake disc modified but not seriously weakened (3.5.1n)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear Mount Bush Soft (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit < 3mm 175/65 R14 82 H - also signs age related perishing - recommend replacement (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Inner brake disc modified but not seriously weakened (3.5.1n)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear Mount Bush Soft (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit < 3mm 175/65 R14 82 H - also signs age related perishing - recommend replacement (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front Inner brake disc modified but not seriously weakened (3.5.1n)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear Mount Bush Soft (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit < 3mm 175/65 R14 82 H - also signs age related perishing - recommend replacement (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Inner brake disc modified but not seriously weakened (3.5.1n)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement Rear Mount Bush Soft (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit < 3mm 175/65 R14 82 H - also signs age related perishing - recommend replacement (4.1.E.1)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecure to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both wipers
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecure to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
How Reliable is the Citroen C3?
Based on 4,435,918 MOT tests across 313,601 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DV09 LDL is a 2009 Citroen C3 in Blue with a 1,360cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65%.
Across all 2009 Citroen C3 models, the average MOT pass rate is 70.4% with a typical mileage of 57,854 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Citroen C3 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 107,792 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DV09 LDL, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Citroen C3 typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 17 years old, this Citroen C3 is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DV09 LDL?
You can check the full history of DV09 LDL by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DV09 LDL registered?
DV09 LDL is a 2009 Citroen C3, first registered on 29 April 2009.
Is DV09 LDL safe to buy?
The MOT history for DV09 LDL shows 20 tests with a 65% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DV09 LDL have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DV09 LDL. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.