MOT Status
ValidMileage
43,702 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Suspension arm ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
exhaust system corroded/deteriorated
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened o/s coil spring cup (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded damage to n/s door (5.3.1 (b) (i))
exhaust corroded/deteriorated
Offside Rear o/s/r axle/sub frame spring coil cup/mounting corroded in centre not considered significantly at load bearing area
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
damage to n/s door
exhaust system corroded/deteriorated
Offside Rear o/s/r axle/sub frame spring coil cup/mounting corroded in centre not considered significantly at load bearing area
Rear Brake hose has slight corrosion to ferrule (1.1.12 (f) (i))
Rear Coil spring corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (3.5 (a))
damage to n/s door
exhaust system corroded/deteriorated
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened spring cup (5.3.3 (b) (i))
damage to n/s door
exhaust corroded/deteriorated
rear axle corroded
Front Service brake excessively fluctuating (1.2.1 (e))
Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened spring cup (5.3.3 (b) (i))
damage to n/s door
exhaust corroded/deteriorated
rear axle corroded
damage to n/s door
exhaust corroded/deteriorated
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
o/s/r spring cup corroded not considered excessive
rear axle corroded
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. 28% (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
corrosion to braking surfaces
corrosion to rear sub-frame/axle
exhaust system corroded/deteriorated
n/s/f door has light panel damage
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside door damaged
Rear surface corrosion to beam axle
outer skin of exhaust corroded
Nearside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Rear Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside door damaged
Rear surface corrosion to beam axle
outer skin of exhaust corroded
damage to n/s door
exhaust system corroded/deteriorated
front brake fluctuating, but not excessively (3.7.B.3)
n/s/f tyre worn on outside edge and worn on outer edge
rear axle beam has surface corrosion
rear wiper deteriorated
both front tyres worn low
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
DY09 RVV is a 2009 Ford Ka in Black with a 1,242cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 82.4%.
Across all 2009 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.5% with a typical mileage of 50,765 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying DY09 RVV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 17 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of DY09 RVV?
You can check the full history of DY09 RVV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was DY09 RVV registered?
DY09 RVV is a 2009 Ford Ka, first registered on 27 March 2009.
Is DY09 RVV safe to buy?
The MOT history for DY09 RVV shows 17 tests with a 82.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does DY09 RVV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on DY09 RVV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.