MOT Status
ValidMileage
15,406 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Headlamp aim unable to be tested (4.1.2 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn bottom ball joint (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light (4.5.4 (a))
Offside Front Play in steering rack inner joint(s) ()
Nearside Front Wheel bearing has slight play (5.1.3 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front floor very rusty on corner and lower edge of sill rusting
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
os outer sill been repaired but is rusting again
slight play in steering colmn mountings
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
slight play in steering column
slight rust ion corners of floors
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Steering rack insecure (2.2.B.1a)
slight play in steering column
slight rust ion corners of floors
both front headlight aims poor
exhaust blow from downpipe join
movement in steering column
n/s/r wheel buckled
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Rear Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
exhaust leak from front to center joint
rear brakes are imbalanced 48%
rear exhaust mount is deteriorated
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
exhaust blow at front to centre joint
fuel cap seal deteriorated
movement in offside front track rod end ball joint
movement in subframe bushes
nearside front tie rod bush split
number plate lamps are dim
rear hand brake lever gaitors split
wiring hanging close to exhaust
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
exhaust blow at front to center joint
fuel cap seal slightly deteriorated
movement in offside front track rod end ball joint
movement in subframe bushes
near/side/front tie rod bush is split
number plate lamps are dim
rear brake imbalance
rear hand brake lever gaitors split
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Nearside Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Offside Inner Front Upper Suspension arm ball joint dust cover insecure so that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Offside Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Offside Rear Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
exhaust blow at front to center joint
fuel cap seal slightly deteriorated
movement in subframe bushes
near/side/front tie rod bush is split
number plate lamps are dim
play in off/side steerinig arm
rear brake imbalance 50%
rear hand brake lever gaitors split
Rear brake imbalance 27%
Exhaust emissions carbon monoxide content excessive (7.3.B.1a)
Nearside Rear rear brake binding (3.7.B.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Rear brake imbalance 27%
has been rebuilt
How Reliable is the Austin Mini 1000 City E?
Based on 44,703 MOT tests across 5,158 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
E191 YFJ is a 1987 Austin Mini 1000 City E in Red with a 998cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 1987 Austin Mini 1000 City E models, the average MOT pass rate is 63.8% with a typical mileage of 50,767 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Austin Mini 1000 City E fails its MOT is subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 3,881 recorded failures. If you're considering buying E191 YFJ, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Austin Mini 1000 City E typically stays on UK roads for around 44 years. At 39 years old, this Austin Mini 1000 City E is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of E191 YFJ?
You can check the full history of E191 YFJ by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was E191 YFJ registered?
E191 YFJ is a 1987 Austin Mini 1000 City E, first registered on 30 November 1987.
Is E191 YFJ safe to buy?
The MOT history for E191 YFJ shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does E191 YFJ have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on E191 YFJ. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.