MOT Status
ValidMileage
130,647 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front body crossmember corroded and holed,but not considered structural
Front body floor areas corroded,but not considered excessive.
Offside Headlamp lens slightly defective (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside front inner wing corroded and holed,but not considered structural.
Offside front outer C.V boot slight leakage of grease
Oil leak, but not excessive from rear axle case (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Corrosion present in both front floor areas & Front body crossmember, but not considered structural.
Corrosion present in both front floor areas & Front body crossmember, but not considered structural.
Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Both Front Inner (6.1.7 (g) (i))
slight corrosion to underside
slight corrosion to underside
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Steering box has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.3 (a) (i))
exhaust band broken
underside corrosion present
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Steering box has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.3 (a) (i))
exhaust band broken
underside corrosion present
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt nearside & offside front outer gaiters perishing (2.5.C.1a)
Spare tyre defective flat ()
front shock absorbers weak
offside front brake binding slightly
silencer support strap corroded / broken
Nearside Front position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low accident damage to headlamp (1.8)
Offside Front Inner Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Rear Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions (4.1.D.1f)
Stop lamp not working high level (1.2.1b)
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b) DANGEROUS
offside front brake binding slightly
front shock absorbers weak
Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt nearside & offside front outer gaiters perishing (2.5.C.1a)
Spare tyre defective flat ()
silencer support strap corroded / broken
Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil low effort on both (2.7.3)
Nearside Front Direction indicator insecure (1.4.A.2b)
Nearside Headlamp insecure (1.7.3)
Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil low effort on both (2.7.3)
Front registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Offside front brake binding (3.7.B.1)
front numberplate cracked, centre exhaust strap broken.
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EA54 MUC is a 2004 Ford Ranger in Grey with a 2,500cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 25 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76%.
Across all 2004 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.2% with a typical mileage of 91,064 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EA54 MUC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 22 years old, this Ford Ranger is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EA54 MUC?
You can check the full history of EA54 MUC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EA54 MUC registered?
EA54 MUC is a 2004 Ford Ranger, first registered on 29 October 2004.
Is EA54 MUC safe to buy?
The MOT history for EA54 MUC shows 25 tests with a 76% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EA54 MUC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EA54 MUC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.