MOT Status
ValidMileage
98,458 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sills both sides (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened & components (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded All springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Exhaust mounting defective mount near flexi pipe corroded and worn (6.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both lower arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Wipers slightly smeary
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged Sidewall damage (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both lower arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both trailing arm bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both rear inner sills corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Coil spring corroded All springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Exhaust mounting defective mount near flexi pipe corroded and worn (6.1.2 (a))
Front Headlamp aim too high Both sides (4.1.2 (a))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both lower arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Front Wipers slightly smeary
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged Sidewall damage (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Anti-roll bar corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both lower arms (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both trailing arm bushes deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both rear inner sills corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Central Rear Seatbelt buckle difficult to engage
Coil spring corroded All four springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged Sidewall damaged (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Rear Lower Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened Both sides (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both trailing arm bushes splitting/deteriorated (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced Both lower sills corroding (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut but not deep enough to reach the ply or cords 235/45/18 cuts outer wall (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Rear Inner Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sills both sides (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened & components (5.3.3 (b) (i))
all underside & components corroded
Nearside Reversing lamp inoperative (4.6.1 (a))
Offside Headlamp lens seriously defective (4.1.1 (b) (ii))
Fluid leak, but not excessive pos coolant leak (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Direction indicator slightly discoloured both (4.4.3 (a))
coolant low toped up 1ltr water
oil low toped up 1 1/2ltrs oil
Offside Rear Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear exhaust bracket broken
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Rear heat shield insecure
Rear middle exhaust bracket
Nearside Rear Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
rear brake pads wearing thin
Offside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
rear brake pads wearing thin
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
How Reliable is the Ford S-max?
Based on 1,368,227 MOT tests across 101,843 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EF10 VJA is a 2010 Ford S-max in Black with a 1,999cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2010 Ford S-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 74.2% with a typical mileage of 83,408 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford S-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 26,089 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EF10 VJA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford S-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 16 years old, this Ford S-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EF10 VJA?
You can check the full history of EF10 VJA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EF10 VJA registered?
EF10 VJA is a 2010 Ford S-max, first registered on 17 June 2010.
Is EF10 VJA safe to buy?
The MOT history for EF10 VJA shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EF10 VJA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EF10 VJA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.