MOT Status
ValidMileage
113,142 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded Both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Offside Front Track rod end seriously misaligned Track rod end loose connecting to inner tie rod (2.1.3 (e))
Coil spring corroded Both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Exhaust mounting defective (6.1.2 (a))
Offside Front Service brake fluctuating, but not excessively (1.2.1 (e))
Offside Front Steering linkage ball joint has slight play inner steering arm (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Front Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.1.2 (c))
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Steering linkage ball joint has slight play inner steering arm (2.1.3 (b) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Coil spring corroded both rear (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both fronts (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
inner rear wheel arches & load space covered,additional rear seats not deployed at time of test,rear brake pads getting low.undershields fitted.front brake hoses part shrouded.
slight chips in windscreen,inner rear wheel arches & load space covered,additional rear seats not deployed at time of test.front brake hoses part shrouded.slight corrosion to exhaust/steel mountings,engine covers & undershields fitted
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened general wear & inner faces in slightly poor condition (3.5.1i)
inner rear wheel arches & load space covered,additional rear seating not deployed at time of test
plastic undershields & engine covers fitted,front brake hoses part shrouded
engine covers & undershields fitted.slight corrosion to exhaust system & steel mounts.
inner rear wheel arches & load space covered.additional rear seats not deployed at time of test
slightly long h/brake travel.front brake hoses part shrouded.
Engine covers fitted obscuring some components in the engine bay
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components
front brake hoses part shrouded,rear tyre treads getting low,
inner rear wheel arches & load space covered,additional rear seating not deployed at time of test & only partial inspection of associated seats available.brake fluid level slightly low,osf tyre odd brand
How Reliable is the Ford S-max?
Based on 1,368,227 MOT tests across 101,843 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EF61 RXC is a 2012 Ford S-max in Black with a 1,997cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 85.7%.
Across all 2012 Ford S-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 75.9% with a typical mileage of 75,817 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford S-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 26,089 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EF61 RXC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford S-max typically stays on UK roads for around 20 years. At 14 years old, this Ford S-max is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EF61 RXC?
You can check the full history of EF61 RXC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EF61 RXC registered?
EF61 RXC is a 2012 Ford S-max, first registered on 11 January 2012.
Is EF61 RXC safe to buy?
The MOT history for EF61 RXC shows 14 tests with a 85.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EF61 RXC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EF61 RXC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.