MOT Status
ValidMileage
74,681 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced underbody (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Sub-frame is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Integral body structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced under-body (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Rear Reversing lamps N/W
Rear Sub-frame corroded but not seriously weakened (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
corrosion to floor pads, sills inner and outer
front + rear subframes corroded
n/s/f side repeater fading colour
reverse lights not working
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm ball joint excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
corrosion to floor pads, sills inner and outer
front + rear subframes corroded
n/s/f side repeater fading colour
reverse lights not working
corrosion to front + rear subframes + suspension components
corrosion to rear inner sills + o/s/r outer sill
n/s/f side repeater fading colour
revere lights not working
some perishing to tyres
some play in n/s/f lower ball joint
some play in o/s/f lower shocker ball joint
Nearside Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn suspension arm inner bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Upper Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn suspension arm inner bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Fuel pipe insecure rear of floor pan (6.1.3 (a) (i))
Supplementary restraint system warning lamp indicates a fault (7.1.6 (a))
corrosion to front + rear subframes + suspension components
corrosion to rear inner sills + o/s/r outer sill
n/s/f side repeater fading colour
revere lights not working
some perishing to tyres
1 x brake pipe securing clip broken n/s/f floor pan - recommend replace
1 x fuel pipe securing clip broken o/s/r floor pan - recommend replace
corrosion blisters to o/s/r sill
corrosion to both rear inner sills
corrosion to front + rear sub frames
corrosion to n/s/f suspension arm
o/s/r side light slightly dim
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is inadequately repaired sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
1 x brake pipe securing clip broken n/s/f floor pan - recommend replace
1 x fuel pipe securing clip broken o/s/r floor pan - recommend replace
corrosion blisters to o/s/r sill
corrosion to both rear inner sills
corrosion to front + rear sub frames
corrosion to n/s/f suspension arm
o/s/r side light slightly dim
light corrosion on front and rear sub frames
Nearside Front Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting likely to fail marked (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Sub-frame attachment bracket/mounting likely to fail marked (5.3.3 (b) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
corrosion to rear brake discs
Offside Track rod end ball joint has excessive play (2.2.B.1f)
Steering rack gaiter split (2.2.D.2d)
Rear Direction indicator slightly discoloured (1.4.A.2f)
corrosion to rear brake discs
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
inner faces of both front brake discs corroded badly but not effecting performance
Nearside Rear Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.5.1g)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
inner faces of both front brake discs corroded badly but not effecting performance
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has a sticker or other obstruction encroaching into the swept area by more than 40mm outside zone 'A' (8.3.1e)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Seat belt damaged but not affecting the operation of the belt (5.2.2a)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Rear Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside front brake juddering slightly (3.7.A.2b)
How Reliable is the MG Tf?
Based on 475,348 MOT tests across 28,732 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EJ54 KNO is a 2004 MG Tf in Silver with a 1,796cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 24 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 66.7%.
Across all 2004 MG Tf models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.6% with a typical mileage of 43,805 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a MG Tf fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 17,890 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EJ54 KNO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The MG Tf typically stays on UK roads for around 24 years. At 22 years old, this MG Tf is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EJ54 KNO?
You can check the full history of EJ54 KNO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EJ54 KNO registered?
EJ54 KNO is a 2004 MG Tf, first registered on 15 November 2004.
Is EJ54 KNO safe to buy?
The MOT history for EJ54 KNO shows 24 tests with a 66.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EJ54 KNO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EJ54 KNO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.