MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
59,653 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
both rear axle bushes deteriasted
corrosion around fuel filler neck
pas pipes corroded
Headlamp aim too high both (4.1.2 (a))
both rear axle bushes deteriasted
corrosion around fuel filler neck
pas pipes corroded
BOTH REAR AXLE BUSHES DETERIATED
EXHAUST MOUNTINGS CORRODED
GENERAL UNDERSIDE CORROSION
PAS PIPES CORRODED
RUST AROUND FUEL FILLER NECK
BOTH REAR AXLE BUSHES DETERIATED
EXHAUST MOUNTINGS CORRODED
GENERAL UNDERSIDE CORROSION
Headlamp aim too high BOTH (4.1.2 (a))
PAS PIPES CORRODED
RUST AROUND FUEL FILLER NECK
BOTH REAR AXLE BUSHES WORN
CORROSION AROUND FUEL FILLER
EXHAUST MOUNTS CORRODED
PAS PIPES CORRODED
Headlamp aim too high and too far to the left. BOTH (4.1.2 (a))
Front Brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened BOTH (1.1.14 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
BOTH REAR AXLE BUSHES WORN
CORROSION AROUND FUEL FILLER
EXHAUST MOUNTS CORRODED
PAS PIPES CORRODED
Corrosion around fuel cap
Exhaust brackets corroded front to back
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn Both (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Macpherson strut mounting corroded and seriously weakened front both (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Inner sill (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Corrosion around fuel cap
Exhaust brackets corroded front to back
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Power steering pipe/hose slightly corroded (2.1.5 (g) (i))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Axle swivel pins and bushes swivel pin and/or bush slightly worn Both (5.1.2 (b) (i))
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
General underside corrosion
Nearside Front Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) slightly corroded (2.3.2)
Nearside Rear Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Offside Rear Inner Vehicle structure has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
General underside corrosion
Nearside Front Front suspension ball joint dust cover deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Power steering pipe(s) or hose(s) slightly corroded (2.3.2)
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both rear inner sills (2.4.A.3)
Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (3.4.1c)
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both rear inner sills (2.4.A.3)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Brakes imbalanced requirements only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.5b)
Front Ball joint dust cover damaged, but preventing the ingress of dirt (2.2.C.1c)
Nail in offside rear tyre
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EJ55 UTM is a 2006 Ford Ka in Silver with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 20 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 70%.
Across all 2006 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 42,791 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EJ55 UTM, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 20 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EJ55 UTM?
You can check the full history of EJ55 UTM by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EJ55 UTM registered?
EJ55 UTM is a 2006 Ford Ka, first registered on 19 January 2006.
Is EJ55 UTM safe to buy?
The MOT history for EJ55 UTM shows 20 tests with a 70% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EJ55 UTM have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EJ55 UTM. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.