MOT Status
ValidMileage
95,394 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear bumper slightly damaged
horn tone slightly low.
rear bumper and bodywork slightly damaged.
Nearside Side repeater lens defective such that the emitted light is adversely affected (4.4.1 (b) (ii))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
rear bumper and bodywork slightly damaged.
Offside rear bumper damage
Front Brake pad(s) worn down to wear indicator Both side (1.1.13 (a) (i))
Horn not working (7.7 (a))
Nearside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Registration plate lamp does not illuminate simultaneously with the position lamps Both side (4.7.2 (a))
Stop lamp(s) not working Both side (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp lens slightly defective Both side (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Offside rear bumper damage
Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated both sides have a small leak. (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides will need attention in the future. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated both sides have a small leak. (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides will need attention in the future. (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt inner boot (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 1.65mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt inner boot (2.5.C.1a)
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
o/s/f tyre just showing tread pattern on edges
Bonnet retaining device ineffective (8.4.2)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Items removed from driver's view prior to test ()
Nearside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt inner boot (2.5.C.1a)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit 1.65mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt inner boot (2.5.C.1a)
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
o/s/f tyre just showing tread pattern on edges
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Front Headlamp aim too low both sides (1.8)
when spun fast the bearings are a little rough.
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Nissan Pixo?
Based on 217,471 MOT tests across 14,452 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EK10 EMF is a 2010 Nissan Pixo in Silver with a 996cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 72.2%.
Across all 2010 Nissan Pixo models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.5% with a typical mileage of 42,120 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Nissan Pixo fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 2,894 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EK10 EMF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Pixo typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 16 years old, this Nissan Pixo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EK10 EMF?
You can check the full history of EK10 EMF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EK10 EMF registered?
EK10 EMF is a 2010 Nissan Pixo, first registered on 31 March 2010.
Is EK10 EMF safe to buy?
The MOT history for EK10 EMF shows 18 tests with a 72.2% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EK10 EMF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EK10 EMF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.