MOT Status
ValidMileage
139,367 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Front Headlamp aim too low (4.1.2 (a))
Vehicles internal headlight adjuster altered to recheck lights ()
Nearside Rear Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.7.1 (b) (i))
front tyres wearing low on the edges
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front brake discs are corroding on the inner surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault t/c warning lamp illuminated (7.12 (e))
Emissions not tested (8.2.2.2 (e))
Engine MIL inoperative or indicates a malfunction (8.2.2.2 (g))
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both front brake discs are corroding on the inner surfaces (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge wearing uneven and out of shape on the inner edge of the tread surface and slightly low in various small places (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge starting to wear low on both edges of the tread surface (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge wearing uneven and out of shape on the inner edge of the tread surface and slightly low in various small places (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Chip in front screen
Front Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened Both front inner brake discs faces slightly corroded (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Outer Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Nearside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.2 (a) (i))
Central Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
nearside headlamp unit has internal damp and misting the inside of the lens
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure outer sidewall (4.1.D.1b)
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush bonding deteriorated resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Central Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 40mm circle outside zone 'A' (8.3.1d)
nearside headlamp unit has internal damp and misting the inside of the lens
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Nail in tyre ()
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both front tyre tread depths are wearing slightly lower on both edges of the tread surfaces
front discs are in a poor condition on the inner surfaces
Nearside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement front bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Trailing arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement front bush (2.4.G.2)
Rear Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
both front brake discs are in a slightly poor condition on inner surfaces
both rear trailing arm front mounting bushes are starting to seperate slightly
both rear tyres are wearing slightly low on both edges of the tread surfaces
How Reliable is the Ford Mondeo?
Based on 12,239,875 MOT tests across 1,205,291 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EK12 RUC is a 2012 Ford Mondeo in Silver with a 1,560cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 15 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 80%.
Across all 2012 Ford Mondeo models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.5% with a typical mileage of 89,688 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Mondeo fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 610,562 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EK12 RUC, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Mondeo typically stays on UK roads for around 33 years. At 14 years old, this Ford Mondeo is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EK12 RUC?
You can check the full history of EK12 RUC by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EK12 RUC registered?
EK12 RUC is a 2012 Ford Mondeo, first registered on 20 March 2012.
Is EK12 RUC safe to buy?
The MOT history for EK12 RUC shows 15 tests with a 80% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EK12 RUC have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EK12 RUC. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.