CarVerify

Free Car Check

EK51 RNF

2002 Ford Puma

Silver Petrol 1679cc
Search another vehicle

MOT Status

Expired
Expires31 Oct 2018
Tests17 (13 pass, 4 fail)
Pass rate76.5%

Mileage

97,849 mi
Last recorded97,849 miles
Recorded on26 Oct 2018
Typical for 2002 Ford Puma65,164 mi

Significantly above average — investigate

4 checks still locked for this Ford
Stolen
Finance
Write-off
Keepers
Unlock full report — £4.99
Instant £30k guarantee
or single check £9.99

Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.

Vehicle Details

RegistrationEK51 RNF
MakeFord
ModelPuma
Year2002
ColourSilver
Fuel typePetrol
Engine1,679cc

All premium checks include

50+ data points
Finance Check (Experian) Insurance Write-off Salvage Auction Stolen Check Previous Owners Ex-Taxi, Police, NHS Mileage Anomaly Import / Export Scrapped Check Plate Changes

MOT History

13 pass 4 fail
Fail 26 Oct 2018 97,849 miles

Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault (1.6 (b))

Electronic stability control warning lamp indicates a fault (7.12 (e))

Nearside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt split (6.1.7 (g) (ii))

Nearside Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded (1.1.12 (f) (i))

Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))

Nearside Registration plate lamp inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))

Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))

Offside Rear Brake hose ferrule excessively corroded (1.1.12 (f) (i))

Nearside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated slight cracking (1.1.12 (b) (ii))

Nearside Rear fog lamp lens defective which has no effect on emitted light cracked (4.5.1 (b) (i))

Offside Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated slight cracking (1.1.12 (b) (ii))

Offside Front Outer Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated cracking serverly (6.1.7 (g) (i))

Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))

signs of slight corrosion to nearside offside outer sills

Pass 31 Oct 2017 95,091 miles

Front Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt bothside (2.5.C.1a)

Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)

Offside Front Lower Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)

Oil leak ()

Rear Lower Body has slight corrosion bothside (6.1.B.2)

Rear Lower coil spring corroded bothside (2.4.C.1b)

Fail 27 Oct 2017 95,020 miles

Front Inner brake disc in such a condition that it is seriously weakened bothside (3.5.1i)

Front Upper Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment bothside (2.5.A.1c)

Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively bothside (8.2.2)

Nearside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed inner edge (4.1.D.1b)

Front Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt bothside (2.5.C.1a)

Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)

Offside Front Lower Suspension arm synthetic bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush (2.4.G.2)

Oil leak ()

Rear Lower Body has slight corrosion bothside (6.1.B.2)

Rear Lower coil spring corroded bothside (2.4.C.1b)

Pass 31 Oct 2016 91,806 miles

Front Lower Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing bothside (2.7.2a)

Front Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt bothside (2.5.C.1a)

Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened bothside (3.5.1i)

Oil leak ()

Rear Lower Shock absorber has slight corrosion to the casing bothside (2.7.2a)

rear axle corroded

slight underbody corrosion

Pass 29 Oct 2015 87,479 miles

brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened o s n s front (3.5.1i)

Pass 28 Oct 2014 86,138 miles

Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Pass 1 Nov 2013 84,740 miles

Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)

Nearside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Nearside Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)

Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)

Offside Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded (3.6.B.2c)

Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Offside Rear wheel bearing has slight play (2.6.2)

Fail 2 Jun 2012 76,862 miles

Nearside Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)

Pass 2 Jun 2012 76,862 miles
Pass 1 Jun 2011 69,222 miles
Fail 1 Jun 2011 69,222 miles

Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)

Pass 8 May 2010 64,408 miles
Pass 16 Apr 2009 58,401 miles

Offside Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

Pass 2 Apr 2008 50,473 miles
Pass 11 Apr 2007 36,210 miles
Pass 19 Jan 2007 35,343 miles
Pass 23 Jan 2006 30,804 miles

Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)

How Reliable is the Ford Puma?

Based on 713,333 MOT tests across 56,808 vehicles.

67.2%
Pass Rate
5,410
Miles/Year
29
Year Lifespan
56,808
On UK Roads

Top MOT Failure Points

Brake pipe excessively corroded 62,649
Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm 45,167
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements 24,837
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively 23,649
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded 20,373
Full Ford Puma reliability report

Don't risk it. Know before you buy.

Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.

£30k guarantee Instant results Cancel anytime

EK51 RNF is a 2002 Ford Puma in Silver with a 1,679cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76.5%.

Across all 2002 Ford Puma models, the average MOT pass rate is 71.0% with a typical mileage of 65,164 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.

The most common reason a Ford Puma fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 62,649 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EK51 RNF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.

The Ford Puma typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Puma is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do I check the history of EK51 RNF?

You can check the full history of EK51 RNF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.

What year was EK51 RNF registered?

EK51 RNF is a 2002 Ford Puma, first registered on 17 January 2002.

Is EK51 RNF safe to buy?

The MOT history for EK51 RNF shows 17 tests with a 76.5% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.

Does EK51 RNF have outstanding finance?

Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EK51 RNF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.

No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.