MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
137,856 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Fluid leak, but not excessive Coolant (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both (4.1.4 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both rear links all bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush Both rear leaf springs, all bushes heavily perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both rear leaf spring rearward mounting points (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Front Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Nearside Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Nearside Stop lamp(s) not working (4.3.1 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Outer sill (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Rear Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Fluid leak, but not excessive Coolant (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output Both (4.1.4 (b))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Anti-roll bar linkage pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement Both rear links all bushes perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush Both rear leaf springs, all bushes heavily perished (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive Both rear leaf spring rearward mounting points (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Corrosion to rear steel brake pipes
Noise from n/s/f strut top mount.
both headlamp patterns poor
light output poor.
Offside Front Wheel bearing rough when rotated (5.1.3 (b) (i))
Parking brake efficiency below requirements (1.4.2 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Inner Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Corrosion to rear steel brake pipes
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Inner Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Noise from n/s/f strut top mount.
Offside Rear Inner Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 2mm (5.2.3 (e))
both headlamp patterns poor
light output poor.
Both headlamps poor condition and patterns poor
Front number plate poor condition
Handbrake performance poor
Noise from n/s/f strut top mount but no play
Rear bump stops missing
Rear tyres deformed and 2mm inner edge
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
headlight patterns poor
Offside Parking brake inoperative on one side (1.4.1 (a))
Parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value (1.4.2 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Nearside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive outer sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Rear Upper Shock absorbers has a slightly worn bush (5.3.2 (c))
headlight patterns poor
Nearside Front top strut mount noise when turning steering
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front top strut mount noise when turning steering
Headlamps poor output.
Some roughness in n/s/f strut top mount.
front brake discs poor condition inner face
Engine oil leaks
Front brake discs inner faces corroded
N/s/r tyre wearing unevenly
Surface corrosion to rear suspension components
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Engine oil leaks
Front brake discs inner faces corroded
N/s/f tyre worn close to service limits
N/s/r tyre wearing unevenly
Surface corrosion to rear suspension components
Corrosion to macpherson strut casings
General corrosion to rear chassis around spring shackles
Rear seats removed at time of test
Some deterioration to front number plate
Some deterioration to rear spring shackle bushes
Some imbalance to front brake operation
Wiper carriers worn
Front abs relucter rings heavily corroded
O/s/r tyre wearing close to service limits and carcass deteriorating
Plastic wheel arch liners preventing full examination
Rear seats removed at time of test
Both fornt tyres wearing unevenly and close to limits
Corrosion to o/s/f brake hose tails
Front number plate deteriorating
General corrosion to rear brake hose ferules and tails
O/s/r tyre carcass deteriorating
Small chips on windscreen
Some deterioration to rear antiroll bar link bushes
Some uneven application and inbalance to front brakes
general corrosion to chassis and structure
Brake performance not tested (3.7.A.1)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) DANGEROUS
Both fornt tyres wearing unevenly and close to limits
Corrosion to o/s/f brake hose tails
Front number plate deteriorating
General corrosion to rear brake hose ferules and tails
O/s/r tyre carcass deteriorating
Small chips on windscreen
Some deterioration to rear antiroll bar link bushes
general corrosion to chassis and structure
Advanced wear to both lower inner track control arm bushes
All rear seats removed at time of test
Corrosion to front shock absorber tubes
Small chips on windscreen
Some inbalance and uneven application to front brakes
Offside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Offside rear parking brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.6a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7) DANGEROUS
Advanced wear to both lower inner track control arm bushes
All rear seats removed at time of test
Corrosion to front shock absorber tubes
Small chips on windscreen
Some inbalance and uneven application to front brakes
Some wear to front antiroll bar 'd' bushes
rear brake pads 30% left
front brake discs worn and ridged
small stone chips front screen
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b)
Front front brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has excessive play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage fractured (2.4.G.1)
front brake discs worn and ridged
small stone chips front screen
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
front brake balance uneven n/s/f 200 o/s/f 160
o/s/r hand brake reading low
rear wiper blade deteriorated
small stone chips front screen
N/S/R tyre wearing outer edge
O/S/R hand brake reading low
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
N/S/R tyre wearing outer edge
O/S/R hand brake reading low
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Rear Parking brake: parking brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.B.7)
both rear tyres 3mm left
How Reliable is the Chrysler Grand Voyager?
Based on 387,238 MOT tests across 25,998 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EK53 ULE is a 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager in Black with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 26 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 65.4%.
Across all 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager models, the average MOT pass rate is 68.6% with a typical mileage of 89,579 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Chrysler Grand Voyager fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 26,896 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EK53 ULE, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Chrysler Grand Voyager typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Chrysler Grand Voyager is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EK53 ULE?
You can check the full history of EK53 ULE by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EK53 ULE registered?
EK53 ULE is a 2003 Chrysler Grand Voyager, first registered on 30 September 2003.
Is EK53 ULE safe to buy?
The MOT history for EK53 ULE shows 26 tests with a 65.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EK53 ULE have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EK53 ULE. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.