MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
28,857 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
REAR SPROCKET CARRIER WORN
THROTTLE HANGS ON WHEN FULL LOCK RIGHT, POSSIBLE CABLE ROUTING WRONG?
Position lamp adversely affected by the operation of another lamp BRAKE LIGHT STUCK ON, TAIL LAMP UN-TESTABLE (4.2.3 (b))
Rear Brake grabbing severely LOCKS ON (1.2.1 (c))
Steering headbearing excessively stiff or notchy (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Drive chain so worn it is likely to fail (6.1.7 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Drive chain sprocket so worn it is likely to fail (6.1.7 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Drive chain sprocket so loose it is likely to fail (6.1.7 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Rear Drive chain sprocket so worn it is likely to fail (6.1.7 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Stop lamp remains on when the brakes are released (4.3.2 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
Throttle control functioning such that safe operation of the motorcycle is adversely affected THROTTLE TUBE FRACTURED, THROTTLE STICKING (6.2.7 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
REAR SPROCKET CARRIER EXCESSIVLEY WORN
REAR SPROCKET RETAINING CLIP BROKEN
Brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Wheel alignment slightly misaligned (2.4 (a))
Front Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Brake component insecure Locking device missing rear torque arm (1.1.21 (c))
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Exhaust system insecure (6.1.2 (a))
Steering headbearing has excessive wear or free play (2.2.2 (f) (i))
Front Shock absorber has a reduced damping effect (5.3.2 (b))
Front Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Rear Wheel spoke slightly corroded (5.2.2 (d))
Central Front Shock absorber has a serious fluid leak front forks leaking (5.3.2 (b))
Central Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Registration plate does not conform to the specified requirements (0.1 (d))
Registration plate lamp missing in the case of a single lamp or all lamps (4.7.1 (b) (ii))
Roller brake test Neither brake control achieves an efficiency of 25% (1.2.2 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush excessively worn swing arm bearings excessively worn (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Throttle operating incorrectly (6.2.7 (a) (i))
Central Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Drive chain sprocket so worn it is likely to fail (6.1.7 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.0 mm thick (1.1.13 (a)) DANGEROUS
Steering headbearing in such a condition that steering control is adversely affected (2.2.2 (f) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake fluid below minimum mark (1.1.10 (d) (i))
Drive chain worn but not considered excessive (6.1.7 (c) (i))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
front brake caliper slider worn
Headlamp not working on dipped beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Headlamp not working on main beam (4.1.1 (a) (ii))
Rear Tyre worn close to the legal limit (5.2.3 (e))
front brake caliper slider worn
Drive chain excessively tight (6.2.1d)
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Offside Rear Direction indicator insecure (1.5.3b)
Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
Exhaust is leaking and excessively noisey (7.1.1b)
Front suspension assembly component excessively bent (2.3.1)
Front wheel spindle securing nut locking device missing (2.3.3a)
Headlamp aim too far to the left (1.6)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the steering (2.5.1)
Wheel has an excessively distorted bead rim. (4.2.2)
Fairings insecure but not likely to impede the steering (2.1.2e)
number plate light in/op
o/s front foot peg bent
oil filler cap not fitted correctly
Brake lever cannot be applied smoothly (3.1.3d)
Drive chain excessively loose (6.2.1d)
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Front Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Front wheel spindle securing nut locking device missing (2.3.3a)
Handlebar deformed (2.1.1b)
Headlamp aim too low and too far to the left. (1.6)
Rear Brake pedal has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm (4.1.3(ii))
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Riders seat insecure (6.2.1a)
Steering movement excessively 'notchy' with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Steering movement excessively stiff with the weight on the lower bearing (2.2.1a)
Steering movement excessively stiff with the wheel raised (2.2.1b)
Throttle operating incorrectly (6.2.1f)
Wheel alignment incorrect which adversely affects the steering (2.5.1)
Nearside Rear shock absorber insecurely mounted (2.4.A.3b) DANGEROUS
Rear Brake reaction bracket insecure (3.2.A1j) DANGEROUS
o/s front foot peg bent
oil filler cap not fitted correctly
front mudgaurd insecure
Steering movement excessively stiff with the weight on the lower bearing (2.2.1a)
Rear Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Front suspension has a slightly reduced damping effect (2.3.6c)
How Reliable is the Honda CG125?
Based on 114,867 MOT tests across 14,014 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EK55 TZB is a 2005 Honda CG125 in Silver with a 124cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 22 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 59.1%.
Across all 2005 Honda CG125 models, the average MOT pass rate is 78.1% with a typical mileage of 15,490 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Honda CG125 fails its MOT is tyre tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, accounting for 2,338 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EK55 TZB, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Honda CG125 typically stays on UK roads for around 44 years. At 21 years old, this Honda CG125 is still in the earlier part of its expected life.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EK55 TZB?
You can check the full history of EK55 TZB by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EK55 TZB registered?
EK55 TZB is a 2005 Honda CG125, first registered on 28 September 2005.
Is EK55 TZB safe to buy?
The MOT history for EK55 TZB shows 22 tests with a 59.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EK55 TZB have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EK55 TZB. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.