MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
71,422 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength floor to sill edge and outer sill panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength outer sill panel and inside wheel arch (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength floor to sill edge and outer sill panel (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength outer sill panel and end inside wheel arch (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both sides (3.4 (b) (ii))
Corrosion in general on exhaust
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin inner pads only (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement trailing bush, both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Upper Macpherson strut pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement strut mounting assembly, both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis rail above subframe, both sides (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floor to sill edges in general, both sides (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Advanced corrosion in general on exhaust
EML is on
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement trailing bush, both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment both sides (2.5.A.1c)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floorpan, both sides (2.4.A.3)
Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill panel in general (5.2.6)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive along both floor to sill edges (5.2.6)
Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded end of outer sill, both sides (2.4.A.3)
Advanced corrosion in general on exhaust
EML is on
Front Lower Suspension arm rubber mounting deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement trailing bush, both sides (2.4.G.2)
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment both sides (2.5.A.1c)
Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive floorpan, both sides (2.4.A.3)
Outer Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive sill panel in general (5.2.6)
Seat belt anchorage prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive along both floor to sill edges (5.2.6)
Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Body has slight corrosion (6.1.B.2)
Offside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EN03 OHR is a 2003 Ford Ka in Blue with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EN03 OHR, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EN03 OHR?
You can check the full history of EN03 OHR by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EN03 OHR registered?
EN03 OHR is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 15 July 2003.
Is EN03 OHR safe to buy?
The MOT history for EN03 OHR shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EN03 OHR have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EN03 OHR. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.