MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
73,275 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
2 front track control arms rear bushes bonding failing,pas pipes showing heavy corrosion offside rear chassis rail showing corrosion
Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength at both sill backs and nearside sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
2 front track control arms rear bushes bonding failing,pas pipes showing heavy corrosion offside rear chassis rail showing corrosion
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive at offside rear chassis rail (2.4.A.3)
nearside front track control arm rear bush bonding failing, pas pipes showing heavy corrosion
corrosion at sill backs,pas pipes corroded
Brake pipe excessively corroded front to rear to offside rear hub (3.6.B.2c)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
corrosion at sill backs,pas pipes corroded
both front track control arms rear bushes bonding failing
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
both front track control arms rear bushes bonding failing
coil spring broken 2 rear (2.4.C.1a)
both front track control arms rear bushes bonding failing,nearside rear tyre stepped
Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
both front track control arms rear bushes bonding failing,nearside rear tyre stepped
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Power steering component(s) leaking (2.3.3b)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Rear Radius arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Suspension arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Power steering ram(s) has slight seepage from a seal (2.3.3b)
Offside Front Suspension arm has slight play in a pin/bush (2.4.G.2)
front discs worn
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front brake disc slightly pitted (3.5.1h)
Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Oil leak
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EN52 ONA is a 2003 Ford Ka in Silver with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 19 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 73.7%.
Across all 2003 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 66.4% with a typical mileage of 47,451 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EN52 ONA, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 23 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EN52 ONA?
You can check the full history of EN52 ONA by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EN52 ONA registered?
EN52 ONA is a 2003 Ford Ka, first registered on 24 January 2003.
Is EN52 ONA safe to buy?
The MOT history for EN52 ONA shows 19 tests with a 73.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EN52 ONA have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EN52 ONA. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.