MOT Status
ValidMileage
93,371 miAbove average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Coil spring corroded all coil springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened rear susp corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded all coil springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Position lamp not working (4.2.1 (a) (ii))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn inner edge (5.2.3 (e))
Rear Suspension arm corroded but not seriously weakened rear susp corroded (5.3.3 (b) (i))
Coil spring corroded all coil springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge worn inner edge and cuts in treads (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Coil spring corroded front and rear springs corroded (5.3.1 (b) (i))
Offside Front Service brake binding but not excessively (1.2.1 (f))
Vehicle structure is corroded but structural rigidity is not significantly reduced rear sub frame and suspension arms corroded (6.1.1 (c) (i))
Exhaust has a minor leak of exhaust gases leaking at centre silencer,also corroded (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Front fog lamp inop
Nearside Headlamp has a product on the lens but not seriously reducing light output lens poor condition (4.1.4 (b))
Rear Coil spring corroded both (5.3.1 (b) (i))
coolant low oil low
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside headlamp aim poor, headlamp lense slightly discoloured
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Nearside headlamp aim poor, headlamp lense slightly discoloured
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear suspension components corroded
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Rear suspension components corroded
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rearmost bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
n/s rear tyre wearing uneven on inner edge
o/s rear tyre wearing low on inner edge and perished
both lower suspension arm rear most bushes worn
n/s front tyre wearing on inner edge
n/s rear tyre wearing uneven on inner edge
o/s rear disc scored
Exhaust system not adequately supported rearmost mount (7.1.1)
Nearside Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
both lower suspension arm rear most bushes worn
n/s front tyre wearing on inner edge
n/s rear tyre wearing uneven on inner edge
o/s rear brake pads showing signs of heat
o/s rear disc scored
Both front tyres worn on inner edges
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside rear tyre worn slightly uneven on inner edge
Rear exhaust mount corroded
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front track control arm rearmost (2.4.G.2)
front tyres worn inner edged
Offside Front Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecure to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc outer (2.5.C.1a)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front track control arm rearmost (2.4.G.2)
front tyres worn inner edged
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
Offside Outer Front constant velocity joint gaiter insecure to the extent that it no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc (2.5.C.1a)
Windscreen has damage to an area less than a 10mm circle within zone 'A' (8.3.1a)
center rear seatbelt missing at time of test
nearside rear tyre has a cut at outer edge
Headlamp deteriorated but light output not reduced (1.7.5a)
headlamp beam image poor
n/s rear tyre perished and worn uneven on inner edge
damage to offside rear bumper
front tyres worn on edges
How Reliable is the Ford Focus C-max?
Based on 1,326,487 MOT tests across 79,932 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EN54 ETO is a 2004 Ford Focus C-max in Red with a 1,798cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 25 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 76%.
Across all 2004 Ford Focus C-max models, the average MOT pass rate is 72.1% with a typical mileage of 75,889 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Focus C-max fails its MOT is tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm, accounting for 67,238 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EN54 ETO, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Focus C-max typically stays on UK roads for around 23 years. At 22 years old, this Ford Focus C-max is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EN54 ETO?
You can check the full history of EN54 ETO by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EN54 ETO registered?
EN54 ETO is a 2004 Ford Focus C-max, first registered on 21 December 2004.
Is EN54 ETO safe to buy?
The MOT history for EN54 ETO shows 25 tests with a 76% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EN54 ETO have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EN54 ETO. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.