MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
102,571 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
CORROSION IN N/S/F INNER WING
Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Nearside Front Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced BOX SECTION CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced OUT RIGGER CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Brake pipe excessively corroded 1 FROM WEIGHT COMPENSATOR TO REAR FLEXY (1.1.11 (c))
Brake pipe excessively corroded 2 FRONT TO REARS (1.1.11 (c))
Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (6.1.2 (a))
Nearside Rear Position lamp showing white light to the rear (4.2.3 (a) (ii))
Offside Rear Brake pipe excessively corroded (1.1.11 (c))
Rear Brakes imbalanced across an axle (1.2.1 (b) (i))
Windscreen washer not working (3.5 (a))
Stop lamp(s) all not working (4.3.1 (a) (iii)) DANGEROUS
CORROSION IN N/S/F INNER WING
Fuel Pipe/s corroded ()
Nearside Front Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced BOX SECTION CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Front Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced OUT RIGGER CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has slight wear in a shackle pin and/or bush (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Rear reflector defective or damaged by up to 50% of the reflecting surface (4.8.1 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Body mounting fixing insecure, but overall security not significantly reduced CORRODED (6.2.2 (c) (i))
Brake pipe slightly corroded both front to rear (3.6.B.2c)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm has slight play in a ball joint (2.4.G.2)
Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both (2.4.A.3)
Rear Vehicle structure slightly corroded within 30cm of towbar mounting (6.6.6)
chassis corroded
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded rear to front over fuel tank (3.6.B.2c)
advise corrosion on inner & outer sills
corrosion on front & rear cross member
near side bonnet corroded
slight play in front steering joints
slight wear in rear axel bushes
Offside Rear position lamp(s) incorrect colour light lens broken (1.1.A.3e)
Rear Brake pipe slightly corroded rear to front over fuel tank (3.6.B.2c)
near side bonnet corroded
corrosion on underside
play in steering joints
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) adversely affected by the operation of another lamp (1.1.A.3f)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) has a product on the lens so it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
corrosion on underside
play in steering joints
rubber bushes perished
slight corrison on brake pipes
slight underbody corrison
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Front Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
Offside Front Mechanical brake component has restricted free movement (3.5.1k)
rubber bushes perished
slight corrison on brake pipes
slight underbody corrison
Fuel pipe/s corroded
n/s rear light damaged
rear metal brake pipes slight corrison
slight under body corrison
suspension bushes perished
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Offside Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (8.2.2)
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front position lamp(s) excessively deteriorated so that it is not visible from a reasonable distance (1.1.A.3d)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Nearside Front Brake pipe excessively corroded (3.6.B.2c) DANGEROUS
Nearside Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Offside Rear Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated anchor pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Service brake: service brake efficiency only just met. It would appear that the braking system requires adjustment or repair. (3.7.C.1a)
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.D.1a)
Offside Headlamp aim too high (1.8)
Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
chassis rusty
Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
chassis rusty
Offside Rear Rear fog lamp not working (1.3.2b)
Nearside front tyre wearing outter edge
How Reliable is the Ford Ranger?
Based on 1,687,380 MOT tests across 189,558 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EO52 VFU is a 2002 Ford Ranger in Black with a 2,499cc diesel engine. This vehicle has been through 18 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 61.1%.
Across all 2002 Ford Ranger models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 100,584 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ranger fails its MOT is brake pipe excessively corroded, accounting for 41,033 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EO52 VFU, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ranger typically stays on UK roads for around 27 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Ranger is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EO52 VFU?
You can check the full history of EO52 VFU by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EO52 VFU registered?
EO52 VFU is a 2002 Ford Ranger, first registered on 27 September 2002.
Is EO52 VFU safe to buy?
The MOT history for EO52 VFU shows 18 tests with a 61.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EO52 VFU have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EO52 VFU. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.