MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
63,102 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides front inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides front and rear (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides rear + perishing cracks (5.2.3 (e))
Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively both front (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e)) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (5.2.3 (d) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened both sides front inner face (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Suspension component mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive both sides front and rear (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides rear + perishing cracks (5.2.3 (e))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides front lower (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge both sides rear +perishing cracks (5.2.3 (e))
both front tyres have slight uneven wear
exhaust system slightly corroded and deteriorated
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides front lower (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides rear + perishing cracks (4.1.E.1)
exhaust system deteriorated and corroded
Offside Headlamp not working on dipped beam (1.7.5a)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides front lower (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides rear + perishing cracks (4.1.E.1)
exhaust system deteriorated and corroded
Rear registration plate delaminated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides lower (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit both sides rear + perishing cracks (4.1.E.1)
exhaust system slightly deteriorated and corroded
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both sides front lower (2.4.G.2)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)
Nearside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front Tyre has ply or cords exposed (4.1.D.1b)
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Front bumper insecure
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Oil leak
Rear registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (6.3.1d)
Offside Stop lamp not working (1.2.1b)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Nearside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1) DANGEROUS
Offside Front Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1) DANGEROUS
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EO56 PZF is a 2006 Ford Ka in Black with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 64.7%.
Across all 2006 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 69.7% with a typical mileage of 42,791 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EO56 PZF, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 20 years old, this Ford Ka is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EO56 PZF?
You can check the full history of EO56 PZF by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EO56 PZF registered?
EO56 PZF is a 2006 Ford Ka, first registered on 29 September 2006.
Is EO56 PZF safe to buy?
The MOT history for EO56 PZF shows 17 tests with a 64.7% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EO56 PZF have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EO56 PZF. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.