MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
15,170 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength chassis/floor (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength chassis/inner sill (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Seat belt anchorage prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced floor (7.1.1 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated both sides (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Front Lower Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Upper macpherson strut..movement in both mounts
Offside Rear Inner wing corroded
Rear Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement axle mount bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated both (1.1.12 (b) (ii))
Front Inner Brake pad(s) wearing thin (1.1.13 (a) (ii))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (1.1.14 (a) (ii))
Offside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (5.3.6 (a) (i))
Oil leak, but not excessive (8.4.1 (a) (i))
Rear Sub-frame pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
front exhaust bracket broken
nearside floor to sill half way along corrode
Front Brake hose slightly deteriorated both (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive (2.4.A.3)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower rear bushes (2.4.G.2)
registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (6.3.1d)
Brake hose slightly deteriorated both front (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
both front lower suspension arms rear bushes split
registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (6.3.1d)
Nearside Front Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded floor (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded chassis and inner and outer sill (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear position lamp(s) not working (1.1.A.3b)
Offside Front coil spring broken (2.4.C.1a)
Brake hose slightly deteriorated both front (3.6.B.4d)
Offside Rear Subframe mounting prescribed area is corroded but not considered excessive chassis (2.4.A.3)
both front lower suspension arms rear bushes split
registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread both (6.3.1d)
both front lower arm rear bushs perished
front brake hoses perished
o/s/f tyre low on outer edge
Offside Front brake disc worn, pitted or scored, but not seriously weakened (3.5.1i)
both front suspension lower arm rear bushes deteriorated
nearside rear tyre on limit and nearside front close to limit...165/65TR13
offside rear chassis corroding
slight corrosion on nearside and offside front floor sections
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
both front suspension lower arm rear bushes deteriorated
front brake hoses deteriorated
pas fluid on minimum
Offside Front Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions (4.1.D.1f)
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
both front suspension lower arm rear bushes deteriorated
front brake hoses deteriorated
pas fluid on minimum
Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
both front suspension lower arm rear bushes deteriorated
offside wiper blade torn
play in both front top suspension mounts
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
both front top leg mountings worn
Nearside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Front Tyre worn close to the legal limit (4.1.E.1)
Offside Front Brake pad(s) wearing thin (3.5.1g)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
ET51 HRN is a 2002 Ford Ka in Blue with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 82.4%.
Across all 2002 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.6% with a typical mileage of 48,988 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying ET51 HRN, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Ka is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of ET51 HRN?
You can check the full history of ET51 HRN by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was ET51 HRN registered?
ET51 HRN is a 2002 Ford Ka, first registered on 24 January 2002.
Is ET51 HRN safe to buy?
The MOT history for ET51 HRN shows 17 tests with a 82.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does ET51 HRN have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on ET51 HRN. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.