MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
69,371 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Nearside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint has slight play (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Front Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge (5.2.3 (e))
Front Steering rack has slight free play detected at steering wheel steering rack leaking (2.3 (a) (i))
Front top strut mount has play
Nearside Front top strut mount has play
Rear both rear suspension arm bushes have play
Front Windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.4 (b) (ii))
Nearside Front Outer Integral body structure or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting sill holled (6.2.2 (d) (i))
Nearside Front Body mounting fixings insecure such that stability is seriously impaired front panel inadiquitly repaired panel secures latch (6.2.2 (c) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Front Steering rack has slight free play detected at steering wheel steering rack leaking (2.3 (a) (i))
Front top strut mount has play
Nearside Front top strut mount has play
Rear both rear suspension arm bushes have play
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arm rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Front Brake disc significantly and obviously worn (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement both front lower arm rear bushes (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
body work damage to near side rear side panal
engine oil level low
Nearside Rear Valve stem seriously damaged (4.1.D.1e)
Offside Steering locking device insecure (2.2.C.1g)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
body work damage to near side rear side panal
engine oil level low
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
Front registration plate deteriorated (6.3.1d)
Steering locking device missing (2.2.C.1g)
Power steering component(s) has slight seepage from a component (2.3.3b)
front reg plate slight cracked+damaged
Offside Front Tyre has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
front reg plate slight cracked+damaged
offside rear tyre has a slight cracks to outer side wall
Nearside Front Macpherson strut has excessive movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Nearside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Nearside Rear Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Front Lower Suspension arm rubber bush deteriorated but not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.G.2)
Offside Front Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
Offside Rear Macpherson strut has slight movement at the upper attachment (2.5.A.1c)
both rear tyres cracking on sidewalls/edge of tread area
brake pedal travel low
front registration plate cracked
offside front tyre worn close to the legal limit + cracking on sidewall
offside outer front steering rack gaitor clip broken but still securing gaitor
movement in nsf suspension leg top mount
Nearside Front Tyre has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (4.1.D.1b)
How Reliable is the Ford Ka?
Based on 8,818,307 MOT tests across 675,715 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EU52 BGV is a 2002 Ford Ka in Blue with a 1,299cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 23 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 69.6%.
Across all 2002 Ford Ka models, the average MOT pass rate is 65.6% with a typical mileage of 48,988 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Ford Ka fails its MOT is suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded, accounting for 404,005 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EU52 BGV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Ka typically stays on UK roads for around 29 years. At 24 years old, this Ford Ka is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EU52 BGV?
You can check the full history of EU52 BGV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EU52 BGV registered?
EU52 BGV is a 2002 Ford Ka, first registered on 5 September 2002.
Is EU52 BGV safe to buy?
The MOT history for EU52 BGV shows 23 tests with a 69.6% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EU52 BGV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EU52 BGV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.