MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
86,893 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
BOTH FRONT AND NEARSIDE REAR TYRES STARTING TO PERISH
FRONT AND REAR TYRES DIFFERENT SIZES
FRONT AND REAR WHEELS DIFFERENT SIZES
Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Nearside Rear Leaf spring splayed but action not impaired (2.4.B.1c)
Offside Rear Leaf spring splayed but action not impaired (2.4.B.1c)
REAR NUMBER PLATE CRACKED
STEERING IDLER BUSHES SLIGHTLY WORN
VEHICLE REPAIRED IN VARIOUS PLACES
WINDSCREEN CHIPPED
FRONT AND REAR TYRES DIFFERENT IN SIZE
FRONT AND REAR WHEELS DIFFERENT
FRONT TYRES STARTING TO PERISH
Front wheel bearing has slight play (2.5.A.3c)
Leaf spring has a slightly deteriorated shackle pin rubber bush not resulting in excessive movement (2.4.B.2)
Leaf spring splayed but action not impaired (2.4.B.1c)
O/S/F SEAT MISSING AT TIME OF TEST
REAR LEAF SPRINGS CORRODED
REAR NUMBER PLATE CRACKED
VEHICLE LOWER STRUCTURE REPAIRED IN VARIOUS PLACES
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Nearside Headlamp not in good working order adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
age cracking to all tyres
engine sounds like it has an air leak
front and rear ind. lenses red
front and rear tyre sizes dif.
fuel cap seal in poor condition
general corrosion to floor pan
heavy corrosion to rear leaf springs
loud klonck heard from osf no faults found
rear leaf spring shackle bushes poor
rear no.plate poor cracked
signs of corrosion and repairs to chassis sections
washer switch poorly positioned
Hazard warning switch faulty (1.4.B.1d)
Nearside Headlamp aim too low (1.8)
Nearside Headlamp not in good working order adversely affecting beam image (1.2.4a)
Nearside rear brake recording little or no effort (3.7.B.5a)
Steering system fouling (2.2.D.2a)
rear brake application uneven (3.7.B.2)
Exhaust has part of the system slightly deteriorated (7.1.1a)
Steering system has slight free play detected at steering wheel (2.2.A.1a)
age cracking to tyre walls
engine sounds like it has an air leak
front and rear tyres sizes dif.
fuel cap seal poor
general corrosion to front floor pan
klonck heard from front suspension no fault found
rear ind. lenses red and front
rear leaf spring shackel bushes poor all
rear leaf springs heavy corrosion
rear no.plate poor cracked
signs of repairs and corrosion to chassis sections
washer switch poorly positioned
Brake cable locking device insecure (3.5.1l)
Nearside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Nearside Front Direction indicator not working (1.4.A.2c)
Nearside Front Torque/reaction arm locating pin locking device missing (2.4.G.3b)
Nearside Inner Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Braking system leaking (3.6.A.1)
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Offside Front Torque/reaction arm locating pin locking device missing (2.4.G.3b)
Offside Inner Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Offside Rear Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Track rod end loose (2.2.B.1d)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
Parking brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Service brake: efficiency below requirements (3.7.B.7)
Brakes imbalanced across an axle (3.7.B.5b) DANGEROUS
nearside front indicator faded
offside front and both front tyres showing signs of age cracking
rear number plate cracked
slight movement front exhaust flange
battery insecure
brake warning light on,no obvious faults found.
corrosion in front chassis rails
corrosion in rear inner wheel arches
near side rear brake slower coming on than offside rear,effiency good but advise manual inspection.
off side front amber indicator slightly discoloured.
off side rear tyre sidewall perishing,not showing reinforcement but advise renewing
Front Exhaust has a major leak of exhaust gases (7.1.2)
Nearside Front Body or chassis has an inadequate repair, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Body or chassis is damaged, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Nearside Front Suspension component mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is excessively corroded (2.4.A.3)
Nearside Rear Suspension spring mounting prescribed area is fractured (2.4.A.3)
Offside Front Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Body or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of the body mountings (6.1.B.2)
Offside Front Direction indicator incorrect colour (1.4.A.2f)
Windscreen washer provides insufficient washer liquid (8.2.3)
speedo cable has been rubbing on bottom end of the steering column
How Reliable is the Ford Mustang?
Based on 140,135 MOT tests across 19,692 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EUD 789K is a 1972 Ford Mustang in Maroon with a 3,278cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 9 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 44.4%.
Across all 1972 Ford Mustang models, the average MOT pass rate is 84.2% with a typical mileage of 53,003 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Ford Mustang fails its MOT is parking brake: efficiency below requirements, accounting for 1,846 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EUD 789K, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Ford Mustang typically stays on UK roads for around 32 years. At 54 years old, this Ford Mustang is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EUD 789K?
You can check the full history of EUD 789K by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EUD 789K registered?
EUD 789K is a 1972 Ford Mustang, first registered on 9 March 1972.
Is EUD 789K safe to buy?
The MOT history for EUD 789K shows 9 tests with a 44.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EUD 789K have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EUD 789K. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.