MOT Status
ValidMileage
43,081 miBelow or average mileage for this year
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Offside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot severely deteriorated leaking grease (6.1.7 (g) (i))
Front number plate damaged
Items removed from driver's view prior to test air freshener ()
Nearside Rear Tyre worn close to legal limit/worn on edge 1.6mm (5.2.3 (e))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Windscreen wiper blade defective (3.4 (b) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre obviously under inflated (5.2.3 (l))
Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing both rear tyres perished (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
unable to carry out rear seat belt check
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective poor image both sides (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement lower arm rear bushes cracked & perished both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing perished both sides (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Anti-roll bar linkage ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt boots split both sides (5.3.4 (b) (ii))
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective poor image both sides (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread damaged (0.1 (b))
Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement lower arm rear bushes cracked & perished both sides (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing perished both sides (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively both discs (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective poor image both sides (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread plate damaged (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated boot perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush perished/cracked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing tyre perished & on 3mm (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush perished/cracked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing tyre perished (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Inner Drive shaft joint constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt small clip insecure (6.1.7 (g) (ii))
Front Brake disc worn, but not excessively both discs (1.1.14 (a) (i))
Front Headlamp lens slightly defective poor image both sides (4.1.1 (b) (i))
Front Registration plate deteriorated but not likely to be misread plate damaged (0.1 (b))
Nearside Front Suspension arm ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated boot perished (5.3.4 (b) (i))
Nearside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush perished/cracked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Nearside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing tyre perished & on 3mm (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Suspension arm pin or bush worn but not resulting in excessive movement rear bush perished/cracked (5.3.4 (a) (i))
Offside Rear Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing tyre perished (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Nearside Front Tyre not fitted in accordance with side wall instructions (5.2.3 (i))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (1.1.13 (a) (ii)) DANGEROUS
Nearside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
Offside Front Tyre slightly damaged/cracking or perishing (5.2.3 (d) (ii))
all tyres perished
How Reliable is the Nissan Pixo?
Based on 217,471 MOT tests across 14,452 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EX60 BLV is a 2010 Nissan Pixo in Grey with a 996cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 17 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 82.4%.
Across all 2010 Nissan Pixo models, the average MOT pass rate is 77.5% with a typical mileage of 42,120 miles. This particular vehicle has performed better than the average for its year.
The most common reason a Nissan Pixo fails its MOT is windscreen wiper does not clear the windscreen effectively, accounting for 2,894 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EX60 BLV, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Nissan Pixo typically stays on UK roads for around 17 years. At 16 years old, this Nissan Pixo is approaching the upper end of the typical lifespan for this model.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EX60 BLV?
You can check the full history of EX60 BLV by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EX60 BLV registered?
EX60 BLV is a 2010 Nissan Pixo, first registered on 24 November 2010.
Is EX60 BLV safe to buy?
The MOT history for EX60 BLV shows 17 tests with a 82.4% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EX60 BLV have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EX60 BLV. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.