MOT Status
ExpiredMileage
27,972 miSignificantly above average — investigate
Not all car check providers offer a guarantee. Don't risk buying from services that can't back their data. CarVerify reports include a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
Vehicle Details
All premium checks include
50+ data pointsMOT History
Front Forks slightly corroded lower sliders (2.2.2 (d) (i))
Front Shock absorber has a light misting of oil (5.3.2 (b))
Headlamp light intensity reduced on dip beam (4.1.4 (a))
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Front suspension has excessive stiffness in the suspension movement. (2.3.6b)
Rear Rear shock absorber has inadequate damping effect. (2.4.A.3b)
Fairings insecure but not likely to impede the steering (2.1.2e)
Front Tyre valve stem slightly damaged (4.1.2c)
Rear Roller brake test indicates slight fluctuation of brake effort (3.3.A1d)
Steering movement slightly 'notchy' (2.2.1b)
Head lamps have no main beam function. There is no switch present.
Number plate light is missing.
frnt forks are sticky in operation.
Front suspension has excessive stiffness in the suspension movement. (2.3.6b)
Rear Stop lamp remains on when the brake is released (1.3.1e)
Front Roller brake test indicates a sticking brake (3.3.A1a) DANGEROUS
head lamps have no main beam function. the switch is not present.
number plate light is missing.
Brake linkage has abnormal movement due to maladjustment (3.2.A1i)
Headlamp aim headlamp damaged and function impaired (1.2.3a)
Rear reflector on motorcycle missing (1.4.1)
Front Roller brake test indicates brake effort rise disproportional to brake lever or pedal effort (3.3.A1c)
Front Stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies (1.3.1a)
Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.2a(i))
Headlamp at least one does not illuminate on dipped beam (1.2.2a(i))
Nearside Brake lever is so short and the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
Steering headbearing has excessive free play (2.2.2)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Indicator switch insecure (1.5.4)
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Brake lever is so short and the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.2a(i))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
Front Brake pad(s) less than 1.5 mm thick (3.2.A1f(i))
Indicator switch insecure (1.5.4)
Rear Brake lever has inadequate reserve travel (3.1.3b)
Rear Brake lever insecure (3.1.2a)
Rear Brake lever is so short and the brake cannot be readily applied (3.1.3c)
Rear Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (4.1.2a(i))
Roller brake test The less effective brake control does not achieve an efficiency of 25%. (3.3.A2b)
How Reliable is the Peugeot Trekker?
Based on 16,224 MOT tests across 3,211 vehicles.
Top MOT Failure Points
Don't risk it. Know before you buy.
Not all vehicle check providers are the same. Some don't offer a data guarantee, which means if their information is wrong, you're on your own. Every CarVerify report is backed by a £30,000 finance data guarantee.
EY54 CTK is a 2005 Peugeot Trekker in Orange with a 49cc petrol engine. This vehicle has been through 14 MOT tests with a personal pass rate of 57.1%.
Across all 2005 Peugeot Trekker models, the average MOT pass rate is 73.5% with a typical mileage of 12,436 miles. This particular vehicle has a lower pass rate than the average for its year, which may indicate maintenance issues worth investigating.
The most common reason a Peugeot Trekker fails its MOT is stop lamp does not illuminate immediately a brake applies, accounting for 537 recorded failures. If you're considering buying EY54 CTK, it's worth having these areas checked by a mechanic before committing.
The Peugeot Trekker typically stays on UK roads for around 28 years. At 21 years old, this Peugeot Trekker is well into its expected lifespan but still has years ahead.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I check the history of EY54 CTK?
You can check the full history of EY54 CTK by running a full vehicle check. This shows you finance, stolen, write-off, MOT history, mileage records and more.
What year was EY54 CTK registered?
EY54 CTK is a 2005 Peugeot Trekker, first registered on 12 February 2005.
Is EY54 CTK safe to buy?
The MOT history for EY54 CTK shows 14 tests with a 57.1% pass rate. To check for outstanding finance, stolen markers, write-off history and mileage discrepancies, run a full vehicle check.
Does EY54 CTK have outstanding finance?
Finance checks require a premium vehicle report. This checks against all major UK finance providers to see if there is any outstanding finance on EY54 CTK. If you buy a car with outstanding finance, the finance company can repossess it.
No warranty or guarantee of accuracy is provided for any free data on this page. The data guarantee applies only to information obtained through the purchase of a full check.